Tools & Wizards About Us
entsafter--test.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

entsafter--test.com

▷ Entsafter Test - Die besten im Vergleich 2022 | entsafter–test.com

Page Load Speed

38.4 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

23.4 sec

Page Rendered

13.7 sec

entsafter--test.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to entsafter--test.com homepage info - get ready to check Entsafter Test best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about entsafter--test.com

Die besten Entsafter im Vergleich 2022 ✓ Saftpressen und Entsafter Test bei Stiftung Warentest, ETM Testmagazin und Konsument und derer Testsieger ✓ Testbericht.

Visit entsafter--test.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Entsafter--test.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 37.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 11 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

entsafter--test.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.3 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,230 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.242

51/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

entsafter--test.com

1345 ms

ir

20232 ms

cropped-cropped-copyright-entsafter-test.com-LOGO.jpg.jpg

254 ms

Entsafter-Test.jpg

484 ms

1.jpg

378 ms

Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Entsafter--test.com, 31% (11 requests) were made to Ir-de.amazon-adsystem.com and 28% (10 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Ir-de.amazon-adsystem.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 65.9 kB (14%)

Content Size

467.4 kB

After Optimization

401.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Entsafter--test.com main page is 467.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 303.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 65.5 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 86.3 kB
  • After compression 21.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 14 B

  • Original 303.8 kB
  • After minification 303.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Entsafter Test images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 131 B

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 35.8 kB
  • After compression 35.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 236 B

  • Original 41.4 kB
  • After minification 41.4 kB
  • After compression 41.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Entsafter--test.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

20

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Entsafter Test. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

entsafter--test.com

entsafter--test.com

1345 ms

ir

ir

20232 ms

cropped-cropped-copyright-entsafter-test.com-LOGO.jpg.jpg

cropped-cropped-copyright-entsafter-test.com-LOGO.jpg.jpg

254 ms

Entsafter-Test.jpg

Entsafter-Test.jpg

484 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

378 ms

ir

ir

20224 ms

ir

ir

20225 ms

ir

ir

20224 ms

ir

ir

20224 ms

ir

ir

20210 ms

hrb9l.css

hrb9l.css

489 ms

hrb9l.js

hrb9l.js

458 ms

8dzmy.js

8dzmy.js

470 ms

css

css

122 ms

Saft-mit-Entsafter-und-Saftpresse.jpg

Saft-mit-Entsafter-und-Saftpresse.jpg

1421 ms

rZjILelay8c.jpg

rZjILelay8c.jpg

1419 ms

Preis-Hinweis.jpg

Preis-Hinweis.jpg

121 ms

ir

ir

20178 ms

ir

ir

20178 ms

ir

ir

20177 ms

ir

ir

20177 ms

ir

ir

20178 ms

41azMTsOVgL._SL160_.jpg

41azMTsOVgL._SL160_.jpg

28 ms

31-oAVb5PIL._SL160_.jpg

31-oAVb5PIL._SL160_.jpg

30 ms

31ZNZNHlkML._SL160_.jpg

31ZNZNHlkML._SL160_.jpg

6 ms

41-KXAu4vtL._SL160_.jpg

41-KXAu4vtL._SL160_.jpg

463 ms

41hsuJxv8nL._SL160_.jpg

41hsuJxv8nL._SL160_.jpg

420 ms

41gfSwfNDkL._SL160_.jpg

41gfSwfNDkL._SL160_.jpg

516 ms

31-oAVb5PIL._SL250_.jpg

31-oAVb5PIL._SL250_.jpg

937 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf

939 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf

1034 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWV4exQ.ttf

1141 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWV4exQ.ttf

1140 ms

41-KXAu4vtL._SL250_.jpg

41-KXAu4vtL._SL250_.jpg

1105 ms

41azMTsOVgL._SL250_.jpg

41azMTsOVgL._SL250_.jpg

901 ms

31Ma5R-6NJL._SL250_.jpg

31Ma5R-6NJL._SL250_.jpg

89 ms

Accessibility Review

entsafter--test.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

entsafter--test.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

entsafter--test.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Entsafter--test.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Entsafter--test.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

entsafter--test.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Entsafter Test. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: