Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

envaxo.com

Envaxo.com is for sale

Page Load Speed

3.8 sec in total

First Response

731 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

474 ms

envaxo.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to envaxo.com homepage info - get ready to check Envaxo best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about envaxo.com

Create a best premium responsive professional Joomla Templates, WordPress Themes, Website Bootstrap templates and themes for your next website project.

Visit envaxo.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Envaxo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 731 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

envaxo.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

38/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,490 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.01

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

pcmmarketplace.com

731 ms

reset.css

129 ms

bootstrap.min.css

378 ms

style.css

316 ms

responsive.css

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Envaxo.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (847 ms) relates to the external source Pcmmarketplace.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 613.9 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

740.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Envaxo.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 553.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 80.7 kB

  • Original 90.8 kB
  • After minification 84.2 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 553.0 kB
  • After minification 524.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Envaxo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 317.7 kB

  • Original 483.4 kB
  • After minification 482.5 kB
  • After compression 165.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 317.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 187.4 kB

  • Original 226.9 kB
  • After minification 222.8 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Envaxo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 187.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (28%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Envaxo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

envaxo.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

envaxo.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

envaxo.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Envaxo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Envaxo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Envaxo. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: