Tools & Wizards About Us
eprocessingnetwork.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 67

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 50

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 20% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 68

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

eprocessingnetwork.com

eProcessingNetwork

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

752 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

327 ms

eprocessingnetwork.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing EProcessingNetwork content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eprocessingnetwork.com

Visit eprocessingnetwork.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Eprocessingnetwork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 752 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eprocessingnetwork.com performance score

67

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eprocessingnetwork.com

752 ms

webfont-opensans.css

82 ms

bootstrap.min.css

173 ms

font-awesome.css

131 ms

sky-forms.css

313 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 97% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Eprocessingnetwork.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Sealserver.trustwave.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Seal-houston.bbb.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (752 ms) belongs to the original domain Eprocessingnetwork.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (49%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eprocessingnetwork.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 44.5 kB

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 7.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.7 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 988.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EProcessingNetwork images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 704.0 kB

  • Original 928.9 kB
  • After minification 772.9 kB
  • After compression 224.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 704.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 465.5 kB

  • Original 548.0 kB
  • After minification 457.8 kB
  • After compression 82.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eprocessingnetwork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 465.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (53%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EProcessingNetwork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

eprocessingnetwork.com

eprocessingnetwork.com

752 ms

webfont-opensans.css

webfont-opensans.css

82 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

173 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

131 ms

sky-forms.css

sky-forms.css

313 ms

weather-icons.min.css

weather-icons.min.css

89 ms

line-icons.css

line-icons.css

127 ms

owl.pack.css

owl.pack.css

123 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

130 ms

animate.css

animate.css

166 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

186 ms

revolution-slider.css

revolution-slider.css

216 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

189 ms

essentials.css

essentials.css

277 ms

layout.css

layout.css

219 ms

header-4.css

header-4.css

235 ms

footer-default.css

footer-default.css

228 ms

darkblue.css

darkblue.css

262 ms

epn.css

epn.css

257 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

270 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

322 ms

jquery.isotope.js

jquery.isotope.js

298 ms

masonry.js

masonry.js

313 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

337 ms

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

jquery.magnific-popup.min.js

320 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

341 ms

jquery.knob.js

jquery.knob.js

344 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

355 ms

epn.js

epn.js

407 ms

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

414 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

408 ms

revolution_slider.js

revolution_slider.js

426 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

426 ms

seal_image.php

seal_image.php

163 ms

blue-seal-96-50-eprocessing-network-llc-13006263.png

blue-seal-96-50-eprocessing-network-llc-13006263.png

422 ms

ePNlogo.png

ePNlogo.png

156 ms

ePNlogoSM.png

ePNlogoSM.png

153 ms

1x1.png

1x1.png

153 ms

ePNEverywhere.png

ePNEverywhere.png

157 ms

solutions.png

solutions.png

158 ms

desktop_certs.png

desktop_certs.png

184 ms

FDLogo.jpg

FDLogo.jpg

156 ms

glo_log_pay_small.gif

glo_log_pay_small.gif

154 ms

TSYS_VAR_Platinum_2014.png

TSYS_VAR_Platinum_2014.png

156 ms

global.png

global.png

157 ms

ElavonLogo.gif

ElavonLogo.gif

159 ms

JetPayLogo.gif

JetPayLogo.gif

179 ms

heartland_pos.png

heartland_pos.png

186 ms

sage-logo.jpg

sage-logo.jpg

189 ms

title_ncnlogo32_small.gif

title_ncnlogo32_small.gif

192 ms

CrossCheck.jpg

CrossCheck.jpg

193 ms

opticard_logo.png

opticard_logo.png

218 ms

PaylianceLogo.png

PaylianceLogo.png

227 ms

EZCheck.gif

EZCheck.gif

230 ms

sps.png

sps.png

236 ms

opensans.woff

opensans.woff

188 ms

opensans-light.woff

opensans-light.woff

226 ms

opensans-bold.woff

opensans-bold.woff

227 ms

opensans-extrabold.woff

opensans-extrabold.woff

227 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

228 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

131 ms

bullet.png

bullet.png

153 ms

sexymobile.png

sexymobile.png

386 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

152 ms

Accessibility Review

eprocessingnetwork.com accessibility score

50

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

eprocessingnetwork.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

eprocessingnetwork.com SEO score

68

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eprocessingnetwork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eprocessingnetwork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eprocessingnetwork.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EProcessingNetwork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: