3.9 sec in total
489 ms
3 sec
458 ms
Click here to check amazing Eps content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eps.aero
Visit eps.aero
We analyzed Eps.aero page load time and found that the first response time was 489 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eps.aero performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value10.6 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value1,780 ms
10/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
489 ms
324 ms
115 ms
105 ms
109 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (114 requests) were addressed to the original Eps.aero, 6% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (744 ms) belongs to the original domain Eps.aero.
Page size can be reduced by 50.6 kB (7%)
707.2 kB
656.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Eps.aero main page is 707.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 651.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eps images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 17 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 94 (82%)
115
21
The browser has sent 115 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eps. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 70 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eps.aero
489 ms
layerslider.css
324 ms
css
115 ms
style.min.css
105 ms
swipebox.min.css
109 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
378 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
125 ms
style.css
116 ms
font-awesome.min.css
125 ms
stylesheet.min.css
132 ms
style_dynamic_callback.php
398 ms
responsive.min.css
184 ms
style_dynamic_responsive_callback.php
404 ms
css
114 ms
jquery.js
203 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
230 ms
layerslider.utils.js
242 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
660 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
261 ms
jquery.swipebox.min.js
285 ms
infinite-scroll.pkgd.min.js
309 ms
front.js
557 ms
email-decode.min.js
308 ms
core.min.js
329 ms
widget.min.js
501 ms
mouse.min.js
656 ms
draggable.min.js
499 ms
droppable.min.js
504 ms
resizable.min.js
501 ms
selectable.min.js
500 ms
sortable.min.js
506 ms
accordion.min.js
503 ms
position.min.js
507 ms
menu.min.js
508 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
510 ms
dom-ready.min.js
512 ms
a11y.min.js
508 ms
autocomplete.min.js
490 ms
button.min.js
430 ms
datepicker.min.js
426 ms
dialog.min.js
442 ms
effect.min.js
429 ms
effect-blind.min.js
429 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
392 ms
effect-clip.min.js
383 ms
effect-drop.min.js
378 ms
effect-explode.min.js
744 ms
effect-fade.min.js
377 ms
effect-fold.min.js
339 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
350 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
328 ms
effect-size.min.js
304 ms
effect-scale.min.js
482 ms
effect-shake.min.js
305 ms
effect-slide.min.js
286 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
267 ms
progressbar.min.js
258 ms
slider.min.js
157 ms
spinner.min.js
320 ms
tabs.min.js
320 ms
tooltip.min.js
481 ms
jquery.form.min.js
318 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
619 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
318 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
314 ms
doubletaptogo.js
319 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
315 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
315 ms
modernizr.min.js
315 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
317 ms
jquery.appear.js
327 ms
absoluteCounter.min.js
323 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
326 ms
jquery.isotope.js
297 ms
easypiechart.js
308 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
309 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
304 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
304 ms
Chart.min.js
302 ms
default_dynamic_callback.php
402 ms
default.min.js
373 ms
ajax.min.js
363 ms
qode-like.js
487 ms
wp-embed.min.js
361 ms
ajax-loader.gif
187 ms
epslogo-tag.png
187 ms
EPS_EAA-header2.jpg
454 ms
slide3-bg2.jpg
189 ms
slide01-background.jpg
192 ms
anywhere.png
191 ms
farther.png
194 ms
further.png
194 ms
cleaner.png
357 ms
faster.png
194 ms
soaring-slide-bg.jpg
258 ms
quote-grainger-22.jpg
273 ms
quote-rutan-2.jpg
272 ms
quote-rask2.jpg
690 ms
quote-miorini-21.jpg
295 ms
fb-logo.png
294 ms
twitter-logo.png
315 ms
ln-logo.png
314 ms
eps.aero
606 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
200 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf
225 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
242 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
244 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
236 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc0CsE.ttf
235 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xGIzc.ttf
237 ms
qode_like_blue.png
261 ms
qode_like_blue@1_5x.png
15 ms
qode_like_blue@2x.png
13 ms
social_share_blue.png
18 ms
social_share_blue@1_5x.png
251 ms
social_share_blue@2x.png
21 ms
mobile_menu_arrow_down.png
22 ms
blockquote_mark_white.png
39 ms
blockquote_mark_white@1_5x.png
40 ms
blockquote_mark_white@2x.png
41 ms
link_mark_white.png
37 ms
link_mark_white@1_5x.png
35 ms
link_mark_white@2x.png
35 ms
eps.aero accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eps.aero best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eps.aero SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eps.aero can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eps.aero main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eps.aero
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eps. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: