947 ms in total
113 ms
699 ms
135 ms
Visit epspack.net now to see the best up-to-date EPSPACK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about epspack.net
High-quality specialty packaging products designed and value-engineered using corrugated boxes, foam and shrink-pack for all products, especially automotive glass,and other services.
Visit epspack.netWe analyzed Epspack.net page load time and found that the first response time was 113 ms and then it took 834 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
epspack.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
53/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.86
4/100
15%
Value6.7 s
57/100
10%
113 ms
54 ms
67 ms
91 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Epspack.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (165 ms) belongs to the original domain Epspack.net.
Page size can be reduced by 212.3 kB (45%)
473.8 kB
261.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Epspack.net main page is 473.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 197.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, EPSPACK needs image optimization as it can save up to 30.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 47.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Epspack.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (67%)
58
19
The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPSPACK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
epspack.net
113 ms
54 ms
style.css
67 ms
style-fix.js
91 ms
css_browser_selector.js
99 ms
search-google.css
104 ms
navigation-f122b51c-9c56-1281-1508-07c4645416d9.css
105 ms
jquery.min.js
156 ms
jquery.jcarousellite.js
109 ms
jquery.simplemodal.js
115 ms
imagegallery.js
145 ms
imagegallery.css
128 ms
imagegallery.locale-en_US.js
127 ms
navigation-7c19d3e8-ca80-6ab0-456e-efa36cff6b9c.css
133 ms
helpers.js
137 ms
jsapi
18 ms
loader.js
17 ms
anti_cache.js
133 ms
analytics.js
40 ms
external-border-none-top-left.png
36 ms
external-border-none-top-right.png
39 ms
external-border-none-top-left2.png
37 ms
external-border-none-top-right2.png
36 ms
external-border-none-top.png
35 ms
external-border-none-left.png
39 ms
external-border-none-left-top.png
58 ms
external-border-none-left-bottom.png
59 ms
external-border-none-right.png
60 ms
external-border-none-right-top.png
60 ms
external-border-none-right-bottom.png
60 ms
border1-black-top-left.png
61 ms
border1-black-top-right.png
80 ms
border1-black-top.png
81 ms
border1-black-left.png
85 ms
border1-black-right.png
86 ms
EPS-new-logo_2.jpg
155 ms
border1-black-bottom-left.png
86 ms
border1-black-bottom-right.png
152 ms
border1-black-bottom.png
153 ms
external-border-none-bottom-left.png
154 ms
external-border-none-bottom-right.png
154 ms
external-border-none-bottom-left2.png
154 ms
external-border-none-bottom-right2.png
155 ms
external-border-none-bottom.png
155 ms
32107fe9-a3be-035f-248b-2c44f1e1b6e9.thumb.jpg
156 ms
6451e558-fd40-8290-e695-531bc320f3f1.thumb.jpg
155 ms
20e32879-0d8d-10b1-cd70-42688bbf2def.thumb.png
156 ms
1bf2a995-abc9-8308-5243-55160c94f398.thumb.jpg
156 ms
390360c0-2820-6a5f-1875-d4651c6d8e14.thumb.jpg
157 ms
f466741b-3a55-8f26-e91e-a75c26f5d077.thumb.jpg
157 ms
3402a3d2-0e38-f8e6-d51a-53f6746758b8.thumb.jpg
162 ms
68259fb4-f3d4-3f7a-8966-fbfd69fa23a8.thumb.jpg
163 ms
ce71e70f-e2c5-21c1-2a33-36d99e5bf8f8.thumb.jpg
163 ms
08305ffb-a8f5-df52-8412-3b934da6f56a.thumb.jpg
163 ms
c5c1096d-a86a-96f5-a48c-a2ff0502b1b3.thumb.jpg
165 ms
collect
12 ms
0c4d2071-1aa0-db38-a78e-f725e5b8e78b.thumb.jpg
140 ms
0fca04ad-1865-8b7f-1816-03f0a0befedd.thumb.jpg
146 ms
eb82ca51-ae30-d80a-5c5b-75603e00a322.thumb.jpg
146 ms
frame-normal-bg.png
145 ms
js
54 ms
epspack.net accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<object> elements do not have alternate text
epspack.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
epspack.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document uses plugins
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epspack.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epspack.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
epspack.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EPSPACK. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: