13.8 sec in total
4.2 sec
9.4 sec
230 ms
Welcome to equivalencytesting.com homepage info - get ready to check Equivalency Testing best content right away, or after learning these important things about equivalencytesting.com
Welcome to the UK's leading GSCE equivalency testing provider. In business since 2000, our results are trusted by many educational establishments.
Visit equivalencytesting.comWe analyzed Equivalencytesting.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.2 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
equivalencytesting.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.4 s
6/100
10%
Value6.8 s
7/100
25%
Value9.4 s
12/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
4214 ms
87 ms
175 ms
330 ms
259 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Equivalencytesting.com, 43% (28 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Equivalencytesting.com.
Page size can be reduced by 67.9 kB (15%)
451.2 kB
383.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Equivalencytesting.com main page is 451.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 188.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Equivalency Testing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 166 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Equivalencytesting.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (85%)
33
5
The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Equivalency Testing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.equivalencytesting.com
4214 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
87 ms
style.css
175 ms
style.min.css
330 ms
cookie-bar.css
259 ms
elementor-caldera-forms.css
1513 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
263 ms
font-awesome.min.css
275 ms
animations.min.css
260 ms
frontend.min.css
344 ms
frontend.min.css
351 ms
global.css
348 ms
post-5.css
386 ms
post-20.css
416 ms
post-27.css
449 ms
css
34 ms
jquery.js
518 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
439 ms
cookie-bar.js
478 ms
style.min.js
502 ms
wp-embed.min.js
524 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
541 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
566 ms
slick.min.js
589 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
607 ms
frontend.min.js
612 ms
position.min.js
626 ms
dialog.min.js
652 ms
waypoints.min.js
699 ms
swiper.jquery.min.js
700 ms
frontend.min.js
709 ms
style.css
563 ms
ET-LOGO.png
197 ms
mixed-students-e1598120310337.jpg
328 ms
books1.jpg
281 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
153 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
162 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
162 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
153 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
161 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
165 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kEk30e0.ttf
164 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk30e0.ttf
162 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk30e0.ttf
165 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkEk30e0.ttf
165 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k30e0.ttf
161 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k30e0.ttf
192 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl0k30e0.ttf
189 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k30e0.ttf
192 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
192 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjovoSmb2Rm.ttf
191 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rm.ttf
192 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDISmb2Rm.ttf
191 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rm.ttf
193 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf
195 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
194 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoDIOmb2Rm.ttf
194 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoJYOmb2Rm.ttf
192 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
332 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDrMfJQ.ttf
195 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDrMfJQ.ttf
194 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDrMfJQ.ttf
196 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJQ.ttf
196 ms
1Pt_g8LJRfWJmhDAuUsSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDrMfJQ.ttf
196 ms
eicons.woff
249 ms
equivalencytesting.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
equivalencytesting.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
equivalencytesting.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Equivalencytesting.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Equivalencytesting.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
equivalencytesting.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Equivalency Testing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: