4.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.1 sec
520 ms
Welcome to ericksong.com homepage info - get ready to check ERICKSONG best content right away, or after learning these important things about ericksong.com
We are architects offering you zoning, building design and permit services in Toronto for residential, commercial and industrial projects.
Visit ericksong.comWe analyzed Ericksong.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ericksong.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value8.1 s
2/100
25%
Value7.7 s
24/100
10%
Value2,150 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.019
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
1064 ms
169 ms
160 ms
162 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Ericksong.com, 8% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ericksong.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.0 kB (17%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ericksong.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 890.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ERICKSONG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 723 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 71.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ericksong.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 71.8 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (65%)
48
17
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ERICKSONG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ericksong.com
1064 ms
autoptimize_c0ebc6e5f0080317a408961033a9b6fa.css
169 ms
autoptimize_single_13a01fdc6dbcd65b98a22b47cd039ca6.css
160 ms
autoptimize_single_14d091f17910cb035e8b8e625bbab403.css
162 ms
autoptimize_single_fedd0a756b28df5627cface90b722e84.css
162 ms
autoptimize_single_4bef862564a09a15ee9814c324338dbe.css
159 ms
autoptimize_single_7acdc8c8fc6ec1c0dbf2a3f14dfa59d9.css
160 ms
css
62 ms
jquery.min.js
215 ms
s-202406.js
36 ms
js
80 ms
domain_bfe0826b_c9c2_4d5b_a1c4_053294884e6d.js
187 ms
autoptimize_4b31bb487ee9eae49d2abed27cfdd4bf.js
433 ms
lazysizes.min.js
209 ms
e-202406.js
34 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
209 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
209 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
366 ms
hooks.min.js
366 ms
i18n.min.js
366 ms
css
21 ms
bat.js
145 ms
gtm.js
144 ms
MATRIXARCHITECTBLUE.jpeg
311 ms
client.js
160 ms
js
79 ms
analytics.js
192 ms
font
189 ms
be.js
222 ms
loader.js
214 ms
276 ms
fbevents.js
213 ms
spinner.gif
147 ms
collect
87 ms
collect
104 ms
collect
96 ms
c3po.jpg
113 ms
call-tracking_7.js
70 ms
collect
34 ms
52 ms
autoptimize_645e25746732f92ab8912b8a07744c57.css
55 ms
collect
20 ms
js
63 ms
EAREVCOLicon-01-e1575221269502.png
55 ms
ga-audiences
32 ms
ga-audiences
29 ms
IMG_0401.jpg
466 ms
IMG_5345-e1575220214606.png
105 ms
wcm
13 ms
lrmuru0c4ghuioago9ehmyeucwoiogr8.js
134 ms
render.ef0a530ad8eeaddb4937.js
41 ms
ericksong.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ericksong.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ericksong.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ericksong.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ericksong.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ericksong.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ERICKSONG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: