1.8 sec in total
215 ms
1.4 sec
262 ms
Click here to check amazing Eshelf content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eshelf.in
Unlock Limitless Knowledge for a price of one meal. Access 10 Million+ Digital Learning Resources for Just 388 Rupees! Welcome to a world of limitless creativity and endless possibilities! For just 38...
Visit eshelf.inWe analyzed Eshelf.in page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
eshelf.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.7 s
30/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value4.5 s
73/100
10%
Value710 ms
42/100
30%
Value0.32
36/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
215 ms
308 ms
236 ms
31 ms
370 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Eshelf.in, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) belongs to the original domain Eshelf.in.
Page size can be reduced by 261.8 kB (51%)
513.1 kB
251.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Eshelf.in main page is 513.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 185.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eshelf images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 87.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.9 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 157.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eshelf.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 157.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (18%)
17
14
The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eshelf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eshelf.in
215 ms
eshelf.in
308 ms
bootstrap.min.css
236 ms
css
31 ms
bootstrap.min.js
370 ms
jquery-2.2.0.min.js
440 ms
font-awesome.min.css
362 ms
style.css
306 ms
jquery.simple-text-rotator.js
293 ms
logo.png
110 ms
slider.jpg
244 ms
e-shelf.png
110 ms
orell.png
110 ms
CaptchaSecurityImages.php
109 ms
orellfooter.png
109 ms
facebook.png
191 ms
twitter.png
189 ms
linkedin.png
190 ms
google.png
197 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff
68 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHw.woff
92 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff
103 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHw.woff
104 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
268 ms
eshelf.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eshelf.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eshelf.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eshelf.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eshelf.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eshelf.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eshelf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: