2.8 sec in total
271 ms
1.9 sec
663 ms
Welcome to estheticon.org homepage info - get ready to check Estheticon best content for Brazil right away, or after learning these important things about estheticon.org
Visit estheticon.orgWe analyzed Estheticon.org page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
estheticon.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.1 s
48/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.192
64/100
15%
Value2.8 s
97/100
10%
271 ms
301 ms
30 ms
23 ms
21 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Estheticon.org, 45% (25 requests) were made to D32dq8khacxhzy.cloudfront.net and 9% (5 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) relates to the external source D32dq8khacxhzy.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 630.2 kB (52%)
1.2 MB
574.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Estheticon.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 558.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estheticon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 353.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 353.1 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 233.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estheticon.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 233.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (45%)
49
27
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estheticon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
estheticon.org
271 ms
www.estheticon.org
301 ms
front.css
30 ms
style.css
23 ms
homepage.css
21 ms
require.js
121 ms
conversion.js
15 ms
dc.js
74 ms
gpt.js
72 ms
218 ms
all.svg
28 ms
bg.png
32 ms
1.jpg
61 ms
vertical-delimiter.png
47 ms
post-count-arrow.png
48 ms
onepixel.gif
46 ms
696815.jpg
210 ms
623711.jpg
210 ms
671333.jpg
711 ms
604286.jpg
713 ms
EN.svg
51 ms
en.png
58 ms
footer-delimiter.png
203 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
27 ms
inpage_linkid.js
18 ms
geoDoctorsHp.js
162 ms
jquery.js
159 ms
modernizr.js
157 ms
759107.jpg
159 ms
__utm.gif
64 ms
ads
179 ms
container.html
139 ms
203 ms
icons.woff
133 ms
jsapi
78 ms
foundation.min.js
75 ms
jquery.validate.js
76 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.min.js
76 ms
geocoder
153 ms
14693687569415126228
104 ms
osd.js
75 ms
sessionid.php
267 ms
25 ms
5
138 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default+en.I.js
8 ms
641866.jpg
82 ms
avatar-doctor.png
164 ms
604630.jpg
164 ms
sessionid.php
337 ms
css
111 ms
jquery.smartbanner.js
10 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
10 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
36 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
36 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
35 ms
estheticon.org accessibility score
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
estheticon.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
estheticon.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
PT
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheticon.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Portuguese language. Our system also found out that Estheticon.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estheticon.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estheticon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: