8.1 sec in total
1.7 sec
6.1 sec
420 ms
Visit etpm.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date ETPM content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about etpm.co.uk
Marine Recruitment Specialists supporting Offshore Energy & Marine clients, worldwide. ISO 9001:2015 & MLC2006 accredited. Jobs posted daily.
Visit etpm.co.ukWe analyzed Etpm.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
etpm.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value13.2 s
0/100
25%
Value13.2 s
2/100
10%
Value1,270 ms
19/100
30%
Value0.119
84/100
15%
Value13.8 s
10/100
10%
1650 ms
254 ms
444 ms
481 ms
235 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Etpm.co.uk, 27% (29 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Etpm.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (37%)
4.4 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Etpm.co.uk main page is 4.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 112.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ETPM images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 369.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Etpm.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (52%)
97
47
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ETPM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.etpm.co.uk
1650 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
254 ms
settings.css
444 ms
style.css
481 ms
fancybox.css
235 ms
owl.carousel.css
183 ms
owl.transitions.css
308 ms
font-awesome.min.css
495 ms
pe-icon-7-stroke.css
430 ms
jplayer.css
484 ms
isotope.css
462 ms
mqueries.css
701 ms
custom-style.php
974 ms
css
15 ms
jquery.js
931 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
719 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
970 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
892 ms
js
32 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
780 ms
jquery.easing.compatibility.js
732 ms
jquery.visible.min.js
918 ms
tweenMax.js
1214 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1106 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
1193 ms
jquery.bgvideo.min.js
986 ms
jquery.fitvids.min.js
987 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
1323 ms
jquery.backgroundparallax.min.js
1140 ms
jquery.counter.min.js
1140 ms
jquery.scroll.min.js
1258 ms
jquery.owl.carousel.min.js
1490 ms
pond-form.js
1321 ms
pond-header.js
1330 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1403 ms
script.js
1559 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1492 ms
white.logo-sml.png
639 ms
dar-etpm-logo-300x189.png
747 ms
etpm-client-rov1-e1479650238609.jpg
1018 ms
800x600.jpg
455 ms
50783871493971
230 ms
Jay-BW-edit.jpg
991 ms
tasha-BW-edit.jpg
1000 ms
50783072342957
191 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcgFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
10 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
10 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
10 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
10 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
10 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1076 ms
50603412300940
218 ms
common.js
5 ms
map.js
17 ms
util.js
17 ms
marker.js
17 ms
onion.js
43 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
75 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
110 ms
controls.js
8 ms
css
38 ms
transparent.png
32 ms
infowindow.js
20 ms
e-etpm-e1479651296572.png
605 ms
google4.png
35 ms
mapcnt6.png
36 ms
sv9.png
36 ms
formCss.css
247 ms
nova.css
251 ms
prototype.forms.js
276 ms
jotform.forms.js
302 ms
tmapctrl.png
18 ms
cb_scout5.png
29 ms
tmapctrl4.png
19 ms
imgs8.png
18 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
11 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
11 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
12 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
11 ms
vt
34 ms
vt
31 ms
vt
32 ms
vt
30 ms
vt
30 ms
vt
31 ms
vt
31 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
37 ms
vt
87 ms
vt
46 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
86 ms
vt
89 ms
vt
87 ms
vt
152 ms
vt
90 ms
vt
152 ms
vt
127 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
171 ms
calendar.png
56 ms
printForm.css
66 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
366 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
445 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
601 ms
loader.gif
80 ms
etpm.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
etpm.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
etpm.co.uk SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etpm.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Etpm.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
etpm.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of ETPM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: