9.9 sec in total
847 ms
6.1 sec
2.9 sec
Visit ework.no now to see the best up-to-date Ework content for Norway and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ework.no
We form successful collaborations, connecting partners & professionals and clients in partnerships, by bridging brilliant minds to great ideas.
Visit ework.noWe analyzed Ework.no page load time and found that the first response time was 847 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ework.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value18.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value4,050 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value23.5 s
1/100
10%
847 ms
276 ms
293 ms
710 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Ework.no, 13% (10 requests) were made to Tools.eurolandir.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to 25625162.fs1.hubspotusercontent-eu1.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Js-eu1.hs-banner.com.
Page size can be reduced by 129.0 kB (10%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ework.no main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ework images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ework.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (66%)
70
24
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ework. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
847 ms
main.min.css
276 ms
module_47680148418_navigation.min.css
293 ms
module_52280669934_cp-language-switcher.min.css
710 ms
LanguageSwitcher.css
64 ms
module_47680148413_cp-rich-text.min.css
700 ms
module_47679486147_cp-hero.min.css
279 ms
module_47680079055_cp-divider.min.css
351 ms
module_47680079046_cp-blocks.min.css
581 ms
module_47680148195_cp-card.min.css
632 ms
module_47680079078_cp-social-icons.min.css
579 ms
module_47679486141_cp-footer-nav.min.css
376 ms
module_50537612777_cp-footer-privacy-links.min.css
893 ms
consent.js
60 ms
eurolandtoolsintegrationobject.js
509 ms
current.js
652 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
623 ms
project.js
657 ms
module_47680148418_navigation.min.js
1004 ms
module_47679486141_cp-footer-nav.min.js
1234 ms
25625162.js
1584 ms
index.js
687 ms
gtm.js
270 ms
globe.svg
432 ms
697 ms
7972cfe0-188e-4aa7-81cb-914476058f81.png
651 ms
66120312-0c35-4b9b-85a2-502108cceacd.png
562 ms
3c51f684-1e42-4268-b2db-5730c6f3d898.png
652 ms
ework-logo.svg
1153 ms
220311_EWORK_D2_2413.jpg
231 ms
220311_EWORK_D2_3469.jpg
229 ms
ework-logo-symbol.svg
1104 ms
social-facebook.svg
209 ms
social-linkedin.svg
295 ms
social-twitter.svg
296 ms
social-instagram.svg
302 ms
Gotham-Book.woff
1029 ms
Gotham-Bold.woff
1412 ms
PublicoHeadline-Bold.woff
1444 ms
%C3%96resundsbron_2.jpg
227 ms
220311_EWORK_D2_3813.jpg
205 ms
220311_EWORK_D2_3208.jpg
211 ms
220311_EWORK_D2_2912.jpg
296 ms
220310_EWORK_D1_0218.jpg
212 ms
analytics.js
129 ms
hotjar-2660871.js
286 ms
conversion_async.js
262 ms
insight.min.js
244 ms
4831495.js
274 ms
fbevents.js
169 ms
collect
84 ms
584893299113036
96 ms
collect
806 ms
EurolandToolAutoSizeObject.js
358 ms
static.js
1182 ms
google-analytics.js
821 ms
484 ms
collectedforms.js
1705 ms
25625162.js
2034 ms
25625162.js
2022 ms
leadflows.js
2025 ms
modules.8203b45d0468dcab4b64.js
530 ms
fb.js
772 ms
leadflows.js
805 ms
4831495.js
772 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
544 ms
261 ms
ga-audiences
262 ms
visit-data
531 ms
style_chart.css
146 ms
style_chart.css
187 ms
collect
32 ms
193 ms
229 ms
487 ms
gotham-book.woff
478 ms
gotham-bold.woff
472 ms
ework.no accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ework.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ework.no SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
NO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ework.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ework.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ework.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ework. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: