3.6 sec in total
357 ms
3.1 sec
223 ms
Visit exa.com.sa now to see the best up-to-date Exa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exa.com.sa
Advanced security for advanced threats
Visit exa.com.saWe analyzed Exa.com.sa page load time and found that the first response time was 357 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
exa.com.sa performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.0 s
1/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value230 ms
86/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value14.7 s
8/100
10%
357 ms
818 ms
146 ms
638 ms
142 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Exa.com.sa, 98% (80 requests) were made to Exaserve.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (841 ms) relates to the external source Exaserve.com.
Page size can be reduced by 661.5 kB (57%)
1.2 MB
489.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Exa.com.sa main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 486.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.2 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 347.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 347.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 269.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exa.com.sa needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 269.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)
79
36
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exa.com.sa
357 ms
www.exaserve.com
818 ms
bootstrap.css
146 ms
main.css
638 ms
bootstrap-responsive.css
142 ms
css
23 ms
layerslider.css
161 ms
social_widget.css
7 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
149 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
219 ms
hoverex-all.css
273 ms
font-awesome.css
147 ms
font-awesome-ie7.min.css
278 ms
jquery.js
299 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
162 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
164 ms
jquery-easing-1.3.js
167 ms
jquerytransit.js
304 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
224 ms
retina.min.js
321 ms
bootstrap.min.js
214 ms
jquery.easing.1.1.js
353 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
366 ms
jquery.mobilemenu.js
375 ms
modernizr.custom.66803.js
394 ms
isotope.js
460 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
355 ms
customSelect.jquery.min.js
365 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
374 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
512 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
521 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
389 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
402 ms
tooltip.js
394 ms
jquery.hoverex.js
396 ms
jquery.imagesloaded.min.js
396 ms
main.js
538 ms
comment-reply.min.js
547 ms
flexslider.css
41 ms
eldo.css
145 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
89 ms
pattern6.png
221 ms
logo.jpg
218 ms
bg1.jpg
219 ms
png1.png
221 ms
block.png
221 ms
exaserveteam1.jpg
221 ms
bg-slide.test2_.png
315 ms
website-218x180.jpg
276 ms
allexa-egypt-s-218x180.jpg
313 ms
qassim.jpg
479 ms
renesys.jpg
313 ms
hic.jpg
338 ms
kingsaud.jpg
412 ms
aramco.jpg
425 ms
iea.jpg
421 ms
ecco-logo.jpg
424 ms
yesser.jpg
473 ms
etisal.jpg
546 ms
saboa.jpg
569 ms
neustar.jpg
558 ms
exaserve-white.png
555 ms
facebook.png
613 ms
googleplus.png
616 ms
twitter.png
679 ms
linkedin.png
701 ms
arrow_color.png
607 ms
header_divider.png
616 ms
cloudex_logo.png
712 ms
exacall_logo.png
722 ms
exahost_logo.png
676 ms
nileweb_logo.png
703 ms
arrow_active.png
784 ms
arrow.png
824 ms
li_style.png
827 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
841 ms
skin.css
704 ms
skin.png
160 ms
loading.gif
149 ms
bg1.jpg
8 ms
png1.png
9 ms
block.png
8 ms
exa.com.sa accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exa.com.sa best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
exa.com.sa SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exa.com.sa can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exa.com.sa main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exa.com.sa
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: