7.1 sec in total
3.3 sec
3.6 sec
134 ms
Visit exarpy.com now to see the best up-to-date Exarpy content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exarpy.com
When you created a Ripple wallet with the Exarpy interface, you chose a 16-digit (0–255) PIN, and were provided with a Ripple wallet address (r***…***), and Ripple wallet secret key (s***…***)…
Visit exarpy.comWe analyzed Exarpy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.3 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
exarpy.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
69/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value4,730 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value14.8 s
8/100
10%
3301 ms
89 ms
51 ms
48 ms
88 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Exarpy.com, 65% (35 requests) were made to Cdn-client.medium.com and 24% (13 requests) were made to Glyph.medium.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Exarpy.com.
Page size can be reduced by 69.3 kB (14%)
497.3 kB
428.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Exarpy.com main page is 497.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 409.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.9 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Exarpy needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 28% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 11.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 46 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exarpy.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (88%)
40
5
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exarpy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
exarpy.com
3301 ms
exarpy-decommissioned-dd83a02cf27f
89 ms
unbound.css
51 ms
manifest.e39f370e.js
48 ms
3057.5e22bbb0.js
88 ms
main.31acc92e.js
109 ms
instrumentation.d6d5fe73.chunk.js
85 ms
reporting.2021fe63.chunk.js
87 ms
4398.db4d4378.chunk.js
121 ms
1752.0a0e21e3.chunk.js
91 ms
6733.1d85727b.chunk.js
104 ms
6481.e3e8b67f.chunk.js
121 ms
8695.5137f8a8.chunk.js
108 ms
4341.09a484a0.chunk.js
115 ms
2522.c9ccdc98.chunk.js
122 ms
5203.e7a22052.chunk.js
132 ms
1957.fe63a49e.chunk.js
126 ms
9599.1c751f8a.chunk.js
127 ms
1711.b70f1a35.chunk.js
130 ms
5268.33d47a92.chunk.js
135 ms
9114.49b6b911.chunk.js
136 ms
5459.80a6ee18.chunk.js
140 ms
6804.53e6dec4.chunk.js
152 ms
9174.7b097d16.chunk.js
161 ms
4129.ee8ae2c8.chunk.js
151 ms
8580.feeb2549.chunk.js
153 ms
1802.ae7e323a.chunk.js
154 ms
2295.fc4d4022.chunk.js
159 ms
4078.da7800a7.chunk.js
168 ms
8883.c8b03d13.chunk.js
171 ms
2550.1e47c72a.chunk.js
171 ms
9408.1c6d46ac.chunk.js
167 ms
397.3f3848dd.chunk.js
173 ms
9150.42fafb2e.chunk.js
174 ms
5005.b5d4a37c.chunk.js
185 ms
2393.077a623d.chunk.js
181 ms
7600.4d7a7595.chunk.js
188 ms
PostPage.MainContent.e67454af.chunk.js
191 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
62 ms
1*dmbNkD5D-u45r44go_cf0g.png
43 ms
1*d7dRXleXZ1Ca36-Dsm_FcQ.png
61 ms
1*d7dRXleXZ1Ca36-Dsm_FcQ.png
72 ms
sohne-400-normal.woff
34 ms
sohne-400-normal.woff
42 ms
sohne-500-normal.woff
53 ms
sohne-500-normal.woff
30 ms
sohne-300-normal.woff
30 ms
sohne-300-normal.woff
38 ms
sohne-700-normal.woff
54 ms
sohne-700-normal.woff
48 ms
source-serif-pro-400-normal.woff
20 ms
source-serif-pro-400-normal.woff
18 ms
source-serif-pro-700-normal.woff
33 ms
source-serif-pro-700-normal.woff
21 ms
exarpy.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exarpy.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
exarpy.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exarpy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exarpy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exarpy.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exarpy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: