5.5 sec in total
725 ms
3.8 sec
952 ms
Click here to check amazing Exaware content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about exaware.com
Save money with Broadcom DNX-based white box solutions for access, aggregation, edge/PE, and network peering.
Visit exaware.comWe analyzed Exaware.com page load time and found that the first response time was 725 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
exaware.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.6 s
13/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value6.7 s
36/100
10%
Value780 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.055
98/100
15%
Value10.1 s
26/100
10%
725 ms
19 ms
442 ms
309 ms
318 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Exaware.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Exaware.com.
Page size can be reduced by 353.5 kB (38%)
926.7 kB
573.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Exaware.com main page is 926.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 440.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 350.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 350.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exaware.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (88%)
67
8
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exaware. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exaware.com
725 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
19 ms
style.min.css
442 ms
frontend.css
309 ms
svgs-attachment.css
318 ms
style.min.css
330 ms
theme.min.css
316 ms
frontend.min.css
753 ms
post-4.css
614 ms
jet-elements.css
771 ms
jet-elements-skin.css
608 ms
swiper.min.css
616 ms
frontend.min.css
1021 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.css
906 ms
all.min.css
917 ms
v4-shims.min.css
926 ms
she-header-style.css
1048 ms
global.css
1220 ms
post-15772.css
1213 ms
post-7467.css
1217 ms
style.min.css
1226 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1313 ms
post-3290.css
1343 ms
style.css
1509 ms
DOMPurify.min.js
1605 ms
jquery.min.js
1653 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1233 ms
svgs-inline-min.js
1607 ms
v4-shims.min.js
1646 ms
she-header.js
1679 ms
css
28 ms
email-decode.min.js
1324 ms
animations.min.css
1422 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
1543 ms
happy-addons.min.js
1329 ms
happy-addons-pro.js
1768 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
1660 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
1420 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
54 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
1686 ms
v2.js
47 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1677 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1819 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1819 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1912 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1824 ms
hooks.min.js
1686 ms
i18n.min.js
1450 ms
frontend.min.js
1770 ms
waypoints.min.js
1677 ms
core.min.js
1656 ms
swiper.min.js
1779 ms
share-link.min.js
1636 ms
dialog.min.js
1654 ms
frontend.min.js
1507 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1984 ms
jet-elements.min.js
1638 ms
jet-tabs-frontend.min.js
1618 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
1622 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
1644 ms
lazyload.min.js
1746 ms
exaware_main.webp
1239 ms
timeline-bg.svg
564 ms
Ellipse-2.svg
512 ms
blob-7.svg
475 ms
Ellipse-2.svg
477 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
51 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
96 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
138 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
139 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
139 ms
Group-303-masked.png
94 ms
DOMPurify.min.js
308 ms
exaware.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
exaware.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
exaware.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exaware.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exaware.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exaware.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exaware. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: