8.1 sec in total
274 ms
7 sec
780 ms
Visit exclusiveuse.com now to see the best up-to-date Exclusive Use content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exclusiveuse.com
Explore an impressive collection of Exclusive Use venues in the UK. From large estates to manors and halls, find the ideal venue for your...
Visit exclusiveuse.comWe analyzed Exclusiveuse.com page load time and found that the first response time was 274 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
exclusiveuse.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.1 s
0/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value19.0 s
0/100
10%
Value1,200 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.094
91/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
274 ms
496 ms
42 ms
38 ms
541 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Exclusiveuse.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Exclusiveuse.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.2 kB (8%)
2.1 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Exclusiveuse.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 160.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 160.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exclusive Use images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exclusiveuse.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (69%)
75
23
The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exclusive Use. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exclusiveuse.com
274 ms
www.exclusiveuse.com
496 ms
mapbox-gl.js
42 ms
mapbox-gl.css
38 ms
8dsb8.css
541 ms
8dsb8.css
157 ms
style.css
293 ms
leaflet.css
154 ms
8dsb8.css
693 ms
8dsb8.js
686 ms
leaflet.js
155 ms
8dsb8.js
403 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
109 ms
css
57 ms
leaflet.css
39 ms
leaflet.js
59 ms
css
32 ms
email-decode.min.js
79 ms
8dtij.css
719 ms
moment.min.js
653 ms
modernizr.custom.js
654 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1189 ms
slick.min.js
1188 ms
fancybox-3.min.js
1188 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
1188 ms
bootstrap-slider.min.js
1207 ms
parallax-background.min.js
1188 ms
jquery.matchHeight-min.js
1546 ms
jquery.vide.min.js
1538 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
1588 ms
effect.min.js
1603 ms
core.min.js
1627 ms
datepicker.min.js
1611 ms
mouse.min.js
1805 ms
slider.min.js
1875 ms
homey-ajax.min.js
2021 ms
custom.min.js
1945 ms
menu.min.js
1906 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1893 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
2149 ms
dom-ready.min.js
2138 ms
hooks.min.js
2153 ms
i18n.min.js
2167 ms
a11y.min.js
2205 ms
autocomplete.min.js
2320 ms
homey-open-street-maps.min.js
2466 ms
social-icons-widget-frontend.js
2256 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2179 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
2436 ms
listing-carousel.js
2367 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
2382 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2307 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
2090 ms
analytics.js
141 ms
gtm.js
608 ms
underscore.min.js
2164 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
2087 ms
vc_grid.min.js
2211 ms
Exclusive-Use-Logo-White.png
2201 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf
37 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-v.ttf
462 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
545 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHA.ttf
545 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwiPHA.ttf
544 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
565 ms
collect
22 ms
collect
551 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1934 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1858 ms
socicon.ttf
1993 ms
28521157070080312479.jpg
2132 ms
ARC_Painswick_HR63-450x300.webp
2067 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
2046 ms
ga-audiences
43 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
1911 ms
avatar.png
1687 ms
exterior-4-450x300.webp
1961 ms
exterior-3-450x300.webp
2102 ms
exterior-450x300.webp
2152 ms
Exterior-5-450x300.jpg
2133 ms
Humber-exterior-450x300.jpg
1985 ms
leonardo-miranda-dvF6s1H1x68-unsplash-1.jpg
2057 ms
Event-Box-Yoga-scaled-e1578327015518.jpg
1959 ms
Event-Pet-Friendly.jpg
2054 ms
93460157078493690714.jpg
2217 ms
Event-Corporate-Event-scaled-e1578326985901.jpg
2166 ms
Event-Box-Corporate-scaled-e1578327031974.jpg
2159 ms
Event-Team-Building-scaled-e1578327055114.jpg
2091 ms
pexels-cottonbro-3171202-2.jpg
2036 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1108 ms
slick.woff
1045 ms
exclusiveuse.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exclusiveuse.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
exclusiveuse.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exclusiveuse.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exclusiveuse.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exclusiveuse.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exclusive Use. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: