Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

extramarks.com

Transform Education with Extramarks: Cutting-Edge Solutions for Schools, Teachers, Students, and Parents

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

11 ms

Resources Loaded

9.7 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

extramarks.com screenshot

About Website

Visit extramarks.com now to see the best up-to-date Extramarks content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about extramarks.com

Discover a new era of education with Extramarks. Our innovative digital solutions empower schools, teachers, students, and parents to revolutionize the way they teach and learn.

Visit extramarks.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Extramarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 11 ms and then it took 10.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

extramarks.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value41.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.9 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,410 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.115

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.6 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

extramarks.com

11 ms

extramarks.com

343 ms

www.extramarks.com

1054 ms

css2

41 ms

ADGMOT35CHFLVDHBJNIG50K96994TLVR74PKOPB7A9QP0FHEN5M0.js

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 186 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 51% of them (94 requests) were addressed to the original Extramarks.com, 38% (71 requests) were made to Cdn-gcp.extramarks.com and 4% (7 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) relates to the external source Cdn-gcp.extramarks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 745.8 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Extramarks.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 620.6 kB

  • Original 760.6 kB
  • After minification 760.6 kB
  • After compression 140.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 620.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 124.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Extramarks images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 291 B

  • Original 99.1 kB
  • After minification 99.1 kB
  • After compression 98.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (22%)

Requests Now

164

After Optimization

128

The browser has sent 164 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Extramarks. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

extramarks.com accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

extramarks.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Requests the notification permission on page load

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

extramarks.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Extramarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Extramarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Extramarks. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: