1.5 sec in total
267 ms
1 sec
195 ms
Visit eyelight.com now to see the best up-to-date Eyelight content for Canada and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyelight.com
Specializing in helping ambitious companies elevate their brand strategy, visual branding, marketing materials and website development to get to the next level.
Visit eyelight.comWe analyzed Eyelight.com page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
eyelight.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
34/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value1,980 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
267 ms
43 ms
77 ms
205 ms
125 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Eyelight.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Use.typekit.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (267 ms) belongs to the original domain Eyelight.com.
Page size can be reduced by 256.6 kB (37%)
685.2 kB
428.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Eyelight.com main page is 685.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 330.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eyelight images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 179.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 179.9 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 44.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyelight.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.5 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (19%)
36
29
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyelight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyelight.com
267 ms
style.css
43 ms
flexslider.css
77 ms
eyelight.com
205 ms
jquery-1.10.2.min.js
125 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
79 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
81 ms
pgk2gmb.js
195 ms
functions.js
81 ms
0380ecc9-6b79-41f4-b090-1bf475b78fb5.js
197 ms
background_full.jpg
75 ms
eyelight.png
56 ms
search_btn.png
45 ms
casestudy_steedandevans_medium__medium.jpg
101 ms
placeholder-2__medium.jpg
46 ms
placeholder-5__medium.jpg
99 ms
placeholder_zebra__medium.jpg
97 ms
placeholder-3__medium.jpg
96 ms
placeholder-4__medium.jpg
96 ms
casestudy_canadiansolar__medium.jpg
97 ms
casestudy_csl__medium.jpg
103 ms
casestudy_eastforest__medium.jpg
151 ms
casestudy_robertsonsite_medium__medium.jpg
111 ms
casestudy_hyphen__medium.jpg
111 ms
casestudy_mtd__medium.jpg
125 ms
casestudy_keybrand__medium.jpg
140 ms
casestudy_pillers__medium.jpg
139 ms
casestudy_cpf__medium.jpg
149 ms
casestudy_lutherwood__medium.jpg
150 ms
casestudy_pi__medium.jpg
169 ms
casestudy_sunlife__medium.jpg
176 ms
bg_coreservices2.png
182 ms
ico-connect.png
184 ms
footer.png
184 ms
letstalk_footerbg2.png
185 ms
ga.js
19 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
39 ms
eyelight.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eyelight.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
eyelight.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyelight.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyelight.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyelight.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eyelight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: