5.8 sec in total
327 ms
5.3 sec
206 ms
Visit eyelinkcargo.com now to see the best up-to-date Eyelinkcargo content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyelinkcargo.com
eyelinkcargo.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, eyelinkcargo.com has it all. We hope yo...
Visit eyelinkcargo.comWe analyzed Eyelinkcargo.com page load time and found that the first response time was 327 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
eyelinkcargo.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value156.4 s
0/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value1,310 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
327 ms
714 ms
34 ms
46 ms
307 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Eyelinkcargo.com, 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Eyelinkcargo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (4%)
29.8 MB
28.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Eyelinkcargo.com main page is 29.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 28.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.2 kB, which is 59% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 91% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eyelinkcargo images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 531.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 530.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyelinkcargo.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 530.2 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyelinkcargo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyelinkcargo.com
327 ms
eyelinkcargo.com
714 ms
css
34 ms
css
46 ms
bootstrap.min.css
307 ms
fontello.css
613 ms
demo.css
518 ms
settings.css
429 ms
layers.css
626 ms
navigation.css
524 ms
owl.carousel.css
414 ms
style.css
718 ms
responsive.css
533 ms
logo.png
630 ms
1920x600_slide1.jpg
2254 ms
1920x600_slide2.jpg
1495 ms
1920x600_slide3.jpg
925 ms
brend1.jpg
707 ms
brend2.jpg
707 ms
brend3.jpg
632 ms
brend4.jpg
669 ms
jquery.modernizr.js
668 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.js
743 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
906 ms
retina.min.js
805 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
843 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
1698 ms
jquery.queryloader2.min.js
967 ms
bootstrap.js
969 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1015 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
1038 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1061 ms
plugins.js
1121 ms
script.js
1153 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSysdUmj.ttf
26 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EuyysdUmj.ttf
45 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1E1yysdUmj.ttf
107 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EbiusdUmj.ttf
106 ms
Linearicons.ttf
661 ms
alarm.woff
717 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtgFgIGaV2g.ttf
107 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtmZgIGaV2g.ttf
106 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtjhgIGaV2g.ttf
107 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtuZnIGaV2g.ttf
108 ms
2sDPZGJYnIjSi6H75xkZZE1I0yCmYzzQtrhnIGaV2g.ttf
107 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
151 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
142 ms
1920x600_slide1.jpg
2303 ms
1920x600_slide2.jpg
899 ms
1920x600_slide3.jpg
483 ms
logo.png
187 ms
brend1.jpg
129 ms
brend3.jpg
228 ms
brend2.jpg
237 ms
brend4.jpg
250 ms
eyelinkcargo.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eyelinkcargo.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
eyelinkcargo.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyelinkcargo.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyelinkcargo.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyelinkcargo.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eyelinkcargo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: