7.6 sec in total
468 ms
6.7 sec
400 ms
Click here to check amazing Ezetap content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ezetap.com
Upgrade Payment system with Razorpay POS Machine. An innovative solution for retailers & businesses to enhance in store payment capabilities.
Visit ezetap.comWe analyzed Ezetap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 468 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ezetap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
7/100
10%
Value11.8 s
0/100
25%
Value9.5 s
12/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.061
97/100
15%
Value13.7 s
10/100
10%
468 ms
1496 ms
489 ms
497 ms
26 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ezetap.com, 68% (52 requests) were made to Site.ezetap.com and 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Site.ezetap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (61%)
3.0 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ezetap.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezetap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 780.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 780.9 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 870.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezetap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 870.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (53%)
64
30
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezetap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezetap.com
468 ms
site.ezetap.com
1496 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
489 ms
layerslider.css
497 ms
css
26 ms
styles.css
496 ms
page-list.css
508 ms
style.css
1027 ms
css
38 ms
style.css
518 ms
font-awesome.css
747 ms
ilightbox.css
752 ms
animations.css
757 ms
frontend.css
764 ms
greensock.js
1050 ms
jquery.js
1269 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1001 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1253 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1021 ms
js
30 ms
maps.js
1255 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1066 ms
scripts.js
1065 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1081 ms
main.min.js
2330 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1290 ms
style.css
1279 ms
analytics.js
20 ms
logo-black-125.png
254 ms
Phone-Number-Forms
563 ms
Ezetap-slide2.jpg
1017 ms
slide-device.png
499 ms
Ezetap-slide4.jpg
763 ms
Ezetap-slide1.jpg
764 ms
Ezetap-slide3.jpg
762 ms
dev-landing-slider.jpg
1278 ms
together-4.png
860 ms
Baja-Alliance-cl.jpg
1015 ms
ba-logo.png
1009 ms
raspberry-case-study.jpg
1014 ms
raspberry-logo-2.png
1107 ms
MicroPensions-cl.jpg
1278 ms
micro-logo-2.jpg
1278 ms
techcrunch-logo.png
1279 ms
business-std-logo.png
1279 ms
techcircle-logo.png
1354 ms
EconomicTimes1.png
1494 ms
YourStory_logo.png
1501 ms
toi.png
1515 ms
ndtv-logo.png
1519 ms
bwi-logo.jpg
1522 ms
Bloomberg_logo.png
1599 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
61 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
64 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
62 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
63 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
62 ms
zhcz-_WihjSQC0oHJ9TCYC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
62 ms
IQHow_FEYlDC4Gzy_m8fcvEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
62 ms
collect
28 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2866 ms
icomoon.woff
2078 ms
skin.css
1548 ms
logo-white-125.png
1559 ms
bootstrap.min.css
219 ms
lsq.landingpage.min.css
245 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
242 ms
bootstrap.min.js
240 ms
jquery.phone.custom.min.js
240 ms
lp_main.v3.min.js
241 ms
stylesheet-31456227004408.css
238 ms
css
291 ms
Tracker.js
982 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
20 ms
blank.gif
516 ms
skin.png
254 ms
ezetap.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ezetap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ezetap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezetap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezetap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezetap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezetap. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: