Tools & Wizards About Us
fagmann.no screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    48% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

fagmann.no

Fagmann

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

431 ms

Resources Loaded

886 ms

Page Rendered

148 ms

fagmann.no screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fagmann content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fagmann.no

Bygge hus, pusse opp eller rehabilitere bolig? Se forbrukerguider og last ned byggeskjema. Søk blant godkjente håndverkere for husbygging i Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, Tromsø, Kristiansand,

Visit fagmann.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Fagmann.no page load time and found that the first response time was 431 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fagmann.no performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.7 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.2 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fagmann.no

431 ms

main.css

112 ms

logo.gif

220 ms

Seforbrukerrd1.jpg

328 ms

Hva_er_fagmann_thumbnail.jpg

226 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Fagmann.no, 13% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (437 ms) belongs to the original domain Fagmann.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.6 kB (32%)

Content Size

88.9 kB

After Optimization

60.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fagmann.no main page is 88.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 51.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 6.6 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 51.1 kB
  • After minification 38.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fagmann needs image optimization as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 34 B

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 17.2 kB
  • After compression 17.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 8.9 kB

  • Original 10.8 kB
  • After minification 7.5 kB
  • After compression 2.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fagmann.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fagmann. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

fagmann.no

fagmann.no

431 ms

main.css

main.css

112 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

220 ms

Seforbrukerrd1.jpg

Seforbrukerrd1.jpg

328 ms

Hva_er_fagmann_thumbnail.jpg

Hva_er_fagmann_thumbnail.jpg

226 ms

Gode%20raad%20lite.jpg

Gode%20raad%20lite.jpg

233 ms

Fagmannkanalen-teaser.gif

Fagmannkanalen-teaser.gif

350 ms

Missfornoyd%20jente%20lite.jpg

Missfornoyd%20jente%20lite.jpg

230 ms

Online%20byggeblanketter%20teaser1.jpg

Online%20byggeblanketter%20teaser1.jpg

437 ms

S%C3%B8k_om_oppf%C3%B8ring.jpg

S%C3%B8k_om_oppf%C3%B8ring.jpg

337 ms

ga.js

ga.js

6 ms

bar_back.gif

bar_back.gif

231 ms

navbg_1.gif

navbg_1.gif

228 ms

navbg_2.gif

navbg_2.gif

318 ms

read-more.gif

read-more.gif

333 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

fagmann.no accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

fagmann.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fagmann.no SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fagmann.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fagmann.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fagmann.no

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fagmann. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: