3.2 sec in total
138 ms
1.4 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Farmington Gardens Ct content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about farmingtongardensct.com
Visit farmingtongardensct.comWe analyzed Farmingtongardensct.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
farmingtongardensct.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value440 ms
64/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.9 s
1/100
10%
138 ms
69 ms
92 ms
84 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Farmingtongardensct.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (913 ms) belongs to the original domain Farmingtongardensct.com.
Page size can be reduced by 345.0 kB (4%)
8.4 MB
8.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Farmingtongardensct.com main page is 8.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 123.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Farmington Gardens Ct images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 241 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 135 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Farmingtongardensct.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (60%)
63
25
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Farmington Gardens Ct. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
farmingtongardensct.com
138 ms
style.min.css
69 ms
theme.min.css
92 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
84 ms
post-550.css
106 ms
swiper.min.css
77 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
82 ms
global.css
128 ms
post-64.css
118 ms
post-570.css
232 ms
post-566.css
150 ms
css
67 ms
jquery.min.js
172 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
215 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
164 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
176 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
183 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
193 ms
animations.min.css
186 ms
email-decode.min.js
173 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
375 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
372 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
303 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
373 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
376 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
386 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
387 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
375 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
376 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
382 ms
hooks.min.js
386 ms
i18n.min.js
376 ms
frontend.min.js
385 ms
waypoints.min.js
385 ms
core.min.js
439 ms
frontend.min.js
427 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
445 ms
v84a3a4012de94ce1a686ba8c167c359c1696973893317
104 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
414 ms
farmington_gardens_logo.png
247 ms
trans_farmington_gardens_logo-1024x232.png
278 ms
41671181_1932712293475309_4658859078758432768_n.jpg
243 ms
KathrynAndrew-496-scaled.jpg
241 ms
Meg_Tom_Michlelle_Gardella494.jpg
237 ms
farmington-gardens-ct-wedding-photography-57.jpg
244 ms
farmington-gardens-wedding-0001.jpg
358 ms
MelissaAlex-667-scaled.jpg
913 ms
KathrynAndrew-389-scaled.jpg
278 ms
knot15.png
280 ms
knot16.png
275 ms
knot17.png
292 ms
knot19.png
473 ms
knot23.png
300 ms
knot_fame.png
551 ms
2015-en_US.png
427 ms
2016-en_US.png
322 ms
2018-en_US.png
388 ms
2019-en_US.png
487 ms
2020-en_US.png
385 ms
cropped-farmington_gardens_logo-1024x232.png
415 ms
cropped-farmington_gardens_logo-300x68.png
508 ms
6NUQ8FmMKwSEKjnm5-4v-4Jh2dJhfQ.woff
72 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
99 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
116 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
119 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
118 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
115 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
152 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
118 ms
embed
351 ms
js
50 ms
main.js
18 ms
farmingtongardensct.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
farmingtongardensct.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
farmingtongardensct.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Farmingtongardensct.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Farmingtongardensct.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
farmingtongardensct.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Farmington Gardens Ct. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: