3.2 sec in total
397 ms
2.7 sec
137 ms
Visit favicon.by now to see the best up-to-date Favicon content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about favicon.by
Онлайн-генератор Favicon.by: создайте фавикон для своего сайта
Visit favicon.byWe analyzed Favicon.by page load time and found that the first response time was 397 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
favicon.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value5.8 s
49/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
397 ms
897 ms
25 ms
140 ms
256 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Favicon.by, 7% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Yastatic.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (897 ms) belongs to the original domain Favicon.by.
Page size can be reduced by 136.3 kB (39%)
347.9 kB
211.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Favicon.by main page is 347.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 174.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 49.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Favicon images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 63.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 36% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Favicon.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (53%)
43
20
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Favicon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
favicon.by
397 ms
www.favicon.by
897 ms
css
25 ms
main.css
140 ms
all.min.js
256 ms
adsbygoogle.js
5 ms
share.js
12 ms
top100.jcn
378 ms
normalize.css
138 ms
dialog.css
249 ms
typography.css
258 ms
rubin.png
514 ms
logo.png
143 ms
yalogo.png
141 ms
arrow-undo-icon.png
141 ms
arrow-redo-icon.png
143 ms
preview.png
277 ms
56d5069e78306.ico
277 ms
56d4e47c2cfba.ico
275 ms
56d4e1245932f.ico
274 ms
56d4dbd9ca3f8.ico
278 ms
56d4c52ac4398.ico
277 ms
56d4c263ccd6b.ico
409 ms
56d4c1e08207b.ico
408 ms
56d4c1b86d16e.ico
410 ms
56d4c0e6cb127.ico
410 ms
56d4ba1371ced.ico
412 ms
56d4b13873784.ico
413 ms
56d4af6b5a352.ico
538 ms
56d4ae5ec6bd9.ico
540 ms
56d4acf07ec94.ico
547 ms
56d4aaea3e94c.ico
544 ms
56d4a93b2375f.ico
551 ms
56d4a71f643bb.ico
551 ms
56d4a7194eedf.ico
670 ms
56d4a6d9120b9.ico
672 ms
56d4a6b5bbffd.ico
685 ms
snapshot.png
686 ms
ca-pub-3232901581345780.js
67 ms
zrt_lookup.html
59 ms
show_ads_impl.js
60 ms
SatVal.png
659 ms
slide.gif
658 ms
hue.png
768 ms
slideHue.png
772 ms
cell_background.png
787 ms
button.png
790 ms
pencil.cur
774 ms
top100.scn
128 ms
hit
296 ms
watch.js
173 ms
ya-share-cnt.html
38 ms
b-share-icon.png
40 ms
b-share_counter_small.png
40 ms
ads
177 ms
788 ms
fql.query
121 ms
share.php
558 ms
osd.js
4 ms
watch.js
731 ms
16214096635112554077
42 ms
abg.js
44 ms
m_js_controller.js
60 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
40 ms
s
23 ms
x_button_blue2.png
23 ms
7-1I540iwtLQZRDhQUP9L-vt70m6ZeYTcveWqB03r34.js
2 ms
favicon.by accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
favicon.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
favicon.by SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Favicon.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Favicon.by main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
favicon.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Favicon. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: