6.4 sec in total
393 ms
5.6 sec
352 ms
Welcome to favrica.net homepage info - get ready to check Favrica best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about favrica.net
FAVRICAは2017年8月をもちまして、サービスを終了いたしました。永らくご愛顧いただき誠にありがとうございました。
Visit favrica.netWe analyzed Favrica.net page load time and found that the first response time was 393 ms and then it took 6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
favrica.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
393 ms
794 ms
837 ms
1300 ms
44 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Favrica.net, 66% (59 requests) were made to Favrica2.s3.amazonaws.com and 6% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Favrica2.s3.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 671.0 kB (68%)
981.0 kB
310.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Favrica.net main page is 981.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 474.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 155.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 155.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 174.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Favrica needs image optimization as it can save up to 174.8 kB or 80% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 252.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Favrica.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (54%)
37
17
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Favrica. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
favrica.net
393 ms
favrica.net
794 ms
application-a56912a4e128320c89d1302f5106d85e.css
837 ms
application-c0a67b03484f54fc625937afdbffb62b.js
1300 ms
adsbygoogle.js
44 ms
pinit.js
65 ms
pinit_fg_en_round_red_16.png
34 ms
logo__favrica-883a1369e9108d595d0d193d4912addd.png
1037 ms
logo__icon-9e55f4b1b2b12598f7705a93621f5d3d.svg
469 ms
logo__logo-45653dec090eaedaae4ef3e83d09b2fa.svg
650 ms
small_file.
831 ms
image.jpg
945 ms
small_file.
937 ms
image.jpg
1013 ms
small_file.
964 ms
image.jpg
997 ms
small_file.
1259 ms
small_file.
1251 ms
image.jpg
1133 ms
small_file.
1469 ms
small_file.
1186 ms
small_file.
1210 ms
small_file.
1463 ms
small_file.
1360 ms
sdk.js
587 ms
ic__search@2x-11129abee21c8f779dc61cce86e9aa21.png
1351 ms
2CE03B_0_0-d7b18d488242d2b796de8f0673d73af2.woff
1500 ms
2CE03B_1_0-9e197f1c27a8f2da4bab07d01130542c.woff
1675 ms
pinit_main.js
53 ms
ca-pub-8909929250368771.js
19 ms
zrt_lookup.html
357 ms
show_ads_impl.js
357 ms
analytics.js
372 ms
recommended
298 ms
history
459 ms
cosmetic__keyword-bgcolor-ae527bad00f205054252ab280878fb24.png
1095 ms
keyword_file.
1141 ms
keyword_file.
1279 ms
keyword_file.
1210 ms
keyword_file.
1278 ms
keyword_file.
1415 ms
keyword_file.
1327 ms
keyword_file.
1382 ms
keyword_file.
1430 ms
keyword_file.
1754 ms
keyword_file.
1460 ms
keyword_file.
1488 ms
keyword_file.
1543 ms
keyword_file.
1605 ms
keyword_file.
1737 ms
keyword_file.
1634 ms
keyword_file.
1752 ms
ads
260 ms
osd.js
12 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
94 ms
73 ms
xd_arbiter.php
296 ms
keyword_file.
1639 ms
2402616860347343913
24 ms
abg.js
53 ms
m_js_controller.js
64 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
82 ms
s
23 ms
x_button_blue2.png
46 ms
keyword_file.
1534 ms
MdyApZkAHG2-UELdOwjNjjFZXSz-CGj4o1JtDR7aGgs.js
4 ms
keyword_file.
1323 ms
keyword_file.
1447 ms
keyword_file.
1429 ms
keyword_file.
1403 ms
keyword_file.
1412 ms
keyword_file.
1468 ms
keyword_file.
1503 ms
keyword_file.
1390 ms
keyword_file.
1380 ms
keyword_file.
1338 ms
keyword_file.
1342 ms
keyword_file.
1316 ms
keyword_file.
1390 ms
keyword_file.
1327 ms
keyword_file.
1436 ms
keyword_file.
1244 ms
keyword_file.
1223 ms
keyword_file.
1222 ms
nr-885.min.js
91 ms
collect
52 ms
ui
33 ms
86015c1eaa
106 ms
favrica.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
favrica.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
favrica.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Favrica.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Favrica.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
favrica.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Favrica. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: