4.8 sec in total
307 ms
4.1 sec
358 ms
Click here to check amazing Festnetz Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about festnetz-vergleich.de
Kabel Internet Anbieter ✓ DSL Vergleich ✓ die günstigsten Angebote im Preisvergleich ✓ jetzt informieren und beantragen
Visit festnetz-vergleich.deWe analyzed Festnetz-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 307 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
festnetz-vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
32/100
10%
Value3.6 s
61/100
25%
Value6.1 s
44/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.1
90/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
307 ms
1137 ms
281 ms
310 ms
313 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Festnetz-vergleich.de, 6% (3 requests) were made to Dwin2.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Festnetz-vergleich.de.
Page size can be reduced by 50.1 kB (25%)
198.7 kB
148.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Festnetz-vergleich.de main page is 198.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 88.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 35.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Festnetz Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 906 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Festnetz-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (22%)
46
36
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Festnetz Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
festnetz-vergleich.de
307 ms
www.festnetz-vergleich.de
1137 ms
style.min.css
281 ms
pagenavi-css.css
310 ms
style.css
313 ms
responsive.css
321 ms
style.css
322 ms
borlabs-cookie-1-de.css
335 ms
borlabs-cookie-config-de.json.js
409 ms
borlabs-cookie-tcf-stub.min.js
465 ms
pub.399233.min.js
344 ms
borlabs-cookie-iabtcf.min.js
337 ms
pub.399233.min.js
347 ms
header_2016.jpg
163 ms
logo_header_small.png
114 ms
telekom.png
112 ms
1und1.gif
113 ms
m-net.gif
118 ms
o2.png
115 ms
unitymedia.gif
247 ms
vodafone.png
247 ms
pyur.png
242 ms
ewe.gif
228 ms
netcologne.png
228 ms
kabel-deutschland.gif
273 ms
telekom_sb.png
336 ms
1und1_sb.png
333 ms
o2_sb.png
369 ms
vodafone_sb.png
380 ms
ewe_sb.png
379 ms
pyur_sb.png
389 ms
unitymedia_sb.png
458 ms
m-net_sb.png
463 ms
netcologne_sb.png
488 ms
kabel-bw_sb.png
500 ms
kabel-deutschland_sb.png
494 ms
telecolumbus_sb.png
501 ms
primacom_sb.png
574 ms
vodafone.png
679 ms
telekom.png
600 ms
1und1.gif
605 ms
o2.png
680 ms
pyur.png
759 ms
m-net.gif
767 ms
netcologne.png
753 ms
ewe.gif
717 ms
festnetz.png
744 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-700.woff
790 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-800.woff
838 ms
init.js
2 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-600.woff
832 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-regular.woff
812 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-300.woff
824 ms
festnetz-vergleich.de accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
festnetz-vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
festnetz-vergleich.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Festnetz-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Festnetz-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
festnetz-vergleich.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Festnetz Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: