2.8 sec in total
706 ms
1.8 sec
328 ms
Visit filesharingtalk.com now to see the best up-to-date File Sharing Talk content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about filesharingtalk.com
Visit filesharingtalk.comWe analyzed Filesharingtalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 706 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
filesharingtalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
71/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value3.0 s
94/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.008
100/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
706 ms
6 ms
394 ms
109 ms
95 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 34% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Filesharingtalk.com, 37% (25 requests) were made to I.fststatic.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to S.fststatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (706 ms) belongs to the original domain Filesharingtalk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 669.1 kB (39%)
1.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Filesharingtalk.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 133.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, File Sharing Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 133.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 329.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 329.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 141.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filesharingtalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 141.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (59%)
66
27
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Sharing Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
706 ms
combo
6 ms
vbulletin-core.js
394 ms
css.php
109 ms
css.php
95 ms
vbulletin_overlay.js
375 ms
vbulletin_cms.js
369 ms
vbulletin_ajax_htmlloader.js
370 ms
css.php
61 ms
fst.js
370 ms
vbulletin_md5.js
372 ms
ga.js
4 ms
adblock_detector.js
30 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
vbulletin_lightbox.js
342 ms
css.php
38 ms
filesharingtalk.png
427 ms
yah-60-left.gif
224 ms
attachment.php
82 ms
attachment.php
64 ms
attachment.php
82 ms
attachment.php
96 ms
attachment.php
79 ms
attachment.php
88 ms
attachment.php
139 ms
attachment.php
130 ms
attachment.php
109 ms
attachment.php
121 ms
attachment.php
141 ms
attachment.php
150 ms
clear.gif
124 ms
cron.php
158 ms
search.png
412 ms
navbit-home.png
412 ms
categories.png
413 ms
sections.png
412 ms
html.png
413 ms
rss_40b.png
424 ms
read_more-right.png
425 ms
firstnew-comment.png
430 ms
next-right.png
428 ms
widget-blog.png
430 ms
widget-forum.png
435 ms
unknown.gif
436 ms
lastpost-right.png
436 ms
avatar31482_16.gif
437 ms
avatar132_3.gif
450 ms
stat_time.png
438 ms
stat_queries.png
447 ms
vr.gif
292 ms
yah-60-right.gif
220 ms
yah-90-left.gif
221 ms
fg.gif
270 ms
yah-90-right.gif
223 ms
fggg.gif
266 ms
top-highlight.png
124 ms
gradient-black-down.png
129 ms
navbit-arrow-right.png
437 ms
treeview-min.js
10 ms
treeview.css
4 ms
rating-15_5.png
406 ms
rating-15_4.png
407 ms
arrow.png
393 ms
icons.png
451 ms
ajax.php
160 ms
progress2.gif
184 ms
lightbox_progress.gif
185 ms
filesharingtalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
filesharingtalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
filesharingtalk.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
N/A
EN
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filesharingtalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Filesharingtalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
filesharingtalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Sharing Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: