Tools & Wizards About Us
firebirdfaq.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

firebirdfaq.org

FirebirdFAQ.org - up-to-date answers to Firebird related questions

Page Load Speed

775 ms in total

First Response

217 ms

Resources Loaded

465 ms

Page Rendered

93 ms

firebirdfaq.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to firebirdfaq.org homepage info - get ready to check FirebirdFAQ best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about firebirdfaq.org

Collection of answers to questions about Firebird docs, setup, installation, errors, security, tips, howtos, guides, sql.

Visit firebirdfaq.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Firebirdfaq.org page load time and found that the first response time was 217 ms and then it took 558 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

firebirdfaq.org performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

93/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.009

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

firebirdfaq.org

217 ms

common.css

94 ms

branding.css

16 ms

firebird.gif

238 ms

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 6 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 50% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Firebirdfaq.org, 33% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 17% (1 request) were made to Cse.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (238 ms) belongs to the original domain Firebirdfaq.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.5 kB (63%)

Content Size

5.5 kB

After Optimization

2.0 kB

  • HTML
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Firebirdfaq.org main page is 5.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 3.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 3.6 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 1.9 kB
  • After minification 1.6 kB
  • After compression 728 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Firebirdfaq.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FirebirdFAQ. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

firebirdfaq.org

firebirdfaq.org

217 ms

common.css

common.css

94 ms

branding.css

branding.css

16 ms

firebird.gif

firebird.gif

238 ms

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

34 ms

branding.css

branding.css

53 ms

Accessibility Review

firebirdfaq.org accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

firebirdfaq.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

firebirdfaq.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Firebirdfaq.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Firebirdfaq.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

firebirdfaq.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of FirebirdFAQ. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: