3 sec in total
529 ms
2.2 sec
285 ms
Welcome to flightfinder.no homepage info - get ready to check Flightfinder best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about flightfinder.no
Visit flightfinder.noWe analyzed Flightfinder.no page load time and found that the first response time was 529 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Flightfinder.no rating and web reputation
flightfinder.no performance score
529 ms
67 ms
594 ms
245 ms
358 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Flightfinder.no, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Flightfinder.no.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (69%)
1.7 MB
537.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Flightfinder.no main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.8 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 24.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flightfinder images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 955.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 955.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightfinder.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (74%)
68
18
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flightfinder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 40 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flightfinder.no
529 ms
css
67 ms
bootstrap-combined.min.css
594 ms
bootstrap-select.css
245 ms
styles.css
358 ms
payment.css
244 ms
olkaStyles.css
360 ms
jquery-ui.css
348 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
364 ms
reveal.css
363 ms
system.css
471 ms
mroautocomplete.css
474 ms
swazzcalendar.css
475 ms
WebResource.axd
606 ms
ScriptResource.axd
752 ms
ScriptResource.axd
585 ms
js
600 ms
js
601 ms
FlightSearchInputForm.js
592 ms
calendar.css
598 ms
json2.js
483 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
838 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.js
488 ms
jquery-ui.js
709 ms
jquery.jmpopups-0.5.1.js
599 ms
jquery.cookie.js
600 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
608 ms
jquery.multiselect.js
680 ms
jquery.loadmask.js
716 ms
jquery.ui.datepicker-sv.js
718 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.js
725 ms
jquery-ui-timepicker-sv.js
759 ms
jquery.reveal.js
824 ms
lodash.backbone.js
834 ms
pubsub.js
856 ms
mro.js
856 ms
mro.dom.js
877 ms
mro.xml.js
941 ms
mro.utils.js
941 ms
mro.page.js
944 ms
mro.object.js
841 ms
mro.ordereddictionary.js
834 ms
mro.ui.js
868 ms
mro.autocomplete.js
933 ms
mro.global.js
939 ms
mro.popupview.js
833 ms
mro.message-manager.js
830 ms
mro.calendar.js
837 ms
mro.searchinput.js
758 ms
swazzcalendar.js
810 ms
mro.flightsearchinput.js
813 ms
ClientScripts.aspx
821 ms
customScripts.js
813 ms
trip-type-1-on.png
729 ms
trip-type-2.png
764 ms
trip-type-3.png
820 ms
Vietnam%20320x389%20NO.jpg
1189 ms
Turkish_320x380_1509.gif
1015 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
59 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
101 ms
ga.js
50 ms
Akagi-Sm.otf
717 ms
UIA_flightfinder_320x380_nor.jpg
959 ms
logos_paypal.png
744 ms
__utm.gif
26 ms
bat.js
17 ms
logo.png
738 ms
flyg.png
727 ms
bok.png
752 ms
bg-form.png
832 ms
cal.png
826 ms
facebook.png
829 ms
twitter.png
842 ms
flightfinder.no SEO score
NO
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightfinder.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flightfinder.no main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
flightfinder.no
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flightfinder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: