Tools & Wizards About Us
flightmapper.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

flightmapper.net

FlightMapper.Net - The Fastest Way of Finding Flights

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

367 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

134 ms

flightmapper.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Flight Mapper content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about flightmapper.net

Visit flightmapper.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Flightmapper.net page load time and found that the first response time was 367 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flightmapper.net performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value750 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flightmapper.net

367 ms

js

62 ms

main.css

48 ms

menu-delimiter-p.gif

48 ms

Start.png

81 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Flightmapper.net, 67% (41 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (367 ms) belongs to the original domain Flightmapper.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 570.2 kB (45%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

685.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flightmapper.net main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 464.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 260.3 kB

  • Original 363.0 kB
  • After minification 362.6 kB
  • After compression 102.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 260.3 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 424.4 kB
  • After minification 417.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flight Mapper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 300.7 kB

  • Original 464.7 kB
  • After minification 464.7 kB
  • After compression 164.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 300.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 3.4 kB
  • After minification 3.0 kB
  • After compression 975 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightmapper.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (38%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

35

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flight Mapper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

flightmapper.net

flightmapper.net

367 ms

js

js

62 ms

main.css

main.css

48 ms

menu-delimiter-p.gif

menu-delimiter-p.gif

48 ms

Start.png

Start.png

81 ms

End.png

End.png

85 ms

indicator.gif

indicator.gif

82 ms

ga.js

ga.js

40 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

common.js

common.js

32 ms

map.js

map.js

29 ms

util.js

util.js

64 ms

infowindow.js

infowindow.js

21 ms

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

StaticMapService.GetMapImage

227 ms

onion.js

onion.js

33 ms

stats.js

stats.js

25 ms

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo

31 ms

controls.js

controls.js

66 ms

css

css

28 ms

transparent.png

transparent.png

55 ms

mapcnt6.png

mapcnt6.png

42 ms

vt

vt

39 ms

vt

vt

14 ms

vt

vt

31 ms

vt

vt

31 ms

vt

vt

33 ms

vt

vt

31 ms

vt

vt

34 ms

vt

vt

32 ms

vt

vt

33 ms

vt

vt

34 ms

vt

vt

35 ms

vt

vt

56 ms

vt

vt

56 ms

vt

vt

59 ms

vt

vt

58 ms

vt

vt

59 ms

vt

vt

60 ms

vt

vt

60 ms

vt

vt

60 ms

vt

vt

61 ms

vt

vt

62 ms

vt

vt

62 ms

vt

vt

63 ms

vt

vt

71 ms

vt

vt

72 ms

vt

vt

71 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

74 ms

vt

vt

75 ms

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf

50 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

54 ms

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

58 ms

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

58 ms

google4.png

google4.png

40 ms

sv5.png

sv5.png

26 ms

tmapctrl.png

tmapctrl.png

24 ms

tmapctrl4.png

tmapctrl4.png

28 ms

imgs8.png

imgs8.png

29 ms

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

AuthenticationService.Authenticate

34 ms

Accessibility Review

flightmapper.net accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

flightmapper.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

flightmapper.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightmapper.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Flightmapper.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

flightmapper.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flight Mapper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: