Tools & Wizards About Us
floodgap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 84

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

floodgap.com

Welcome to Floodgap Systems' WWW server

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

floodgap.com screenshot

About Website

Visit floodgap.com now to see the best up-to-date Floodgap content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about floodgap.com

Visit floodgap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Floodgap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

floodgap.com performance score

84

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.374

28/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

floodgap.com

264 ms

www.floodgap.com

385 ms

cywatb.jpg

598 ms

flogo160.gif

349 ms

tomymin.jpg

511 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Floodgap.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Floodgap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 9.7 kB (11%)

Content Size

87.6 kB

After Optimization

77.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Floodgap.com main page is 87.6 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 73.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 14.3 kB
  • After compression 5.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 110 B

  • Original 73.0 kB
  • After minification 72.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Floodgap images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Floodgap. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

floodgap.com

floodgap.com

264 ms

www.floodgap.com

www.floodgap.com

385 ms

cywatb.jpg

cywatb.jpg

598 ms

flogo160.gif

flogo160.gif

349 ms

tomymin.jpg

tomymin.jpg

511 ms

goldstar.gif

goldstar.gif

367 ms

centre.jpg

centre.jpg

546 ms

30temp.jpg

30temp.jpg

579 ms

flogoback.jpg

flogoback.jpg

772 ms

aix.gif

aix.gif

578 ms

hostedmac.gif

hostedmac.gif

696 ms

poweredbydarwin.gif

poweredbydarwin.gif

703 ms

netbsd.jpg

netbsd.jpg

714 ms

sol.gif

sol.gif

751 ms

c64ik.gif

c64ik.gif

806 ms

httpismall.gif

httpismall.gif

955 ms

cnsafe.gif

cnsafe.gif

1015 ms

Accessibility Review

floodgap.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

floodgap.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

floodgap.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floodgap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Floodgap.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

floodgap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Floodgap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: