Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

floodrisk2012.net

您的域名已过期|易名科技:域名交易,域名注册,域名查询,域名应用:eName.Net

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

335 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

235 ms

floodrisk2012.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to floodrisk2012.net homepage info - get ready to check Floodrisk 2012 best content right away, or after learning these important things about floodrisk2012.net

Visit floodrisk2012.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Floodrisk2012.net page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

floodrisk2012.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

floodrisk2012.net

335 ms

styles.css

126 ms

jquery.min.js

5 ms

fadeSlideShow.js

178 ms

floodrisk2012-logo.jpg

200 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Floodrisk2012.net, 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) belongs to the original domain Floodrisk2012.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 57.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

622.2 kB

After Optimization

565.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Floodrisk2012.net main page is 622.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 548.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 9.6 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17.7 kB

  • Original 548.0 kB
  • After minification 530.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Floodrisk 2012 images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 11.4 kB

  • Original 38.9 kB
  • After minification 35.0 kB
  • After compression 27.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.4 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 21.3 kB

  • Original 25.3 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Floodrisk2012.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (14%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Floodrisk 2012. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

floodrisk2012.net accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

floodrisk2012.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

floodrisk2012.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Floodrisk2012.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Floodrisk2012.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Floodrisk 2012. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: