Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

fort-aspenwood.com

Fort Aspenwood

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

478 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

592 ms

fort-aspenwood.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fort-aspenwood.com now to see the best up-to-date Fort Aspenwood content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fort-aspenwood.com

Visit fort-aspenwood.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fort-aspenwood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fort-aspenwood.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

92/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.fort-aspenwood.com

478 ms

index.php

116 ms

jquery.min.js

34 ms

cookie.js

51 ms

ipbforumskins.js

52 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Fort-aspenwood.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Gravatar.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (514 ms) belongs to the original domain Fort-aspenwood.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.2 kB (9%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Fort-aspenwood.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 999.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 77.9 kB

  • Original 89.1 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 11.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 26.4 kB, which is 30% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 19.2 kB

  • Original 999.0 kB
  • After minification 979.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fort Aspenwood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 35.3 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 34.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (52%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fort Aspenwood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fort-aspenwood.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fort-aspenwood.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fort-aspenwood.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fort-aspenwood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fort-aspenwood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fort Aspenwood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: