7 sec in total
460 ms
6 sec
445 ms
Welcome to fotorbit.com homepage info - get ready to check Fotorbit best content right away, or after learning these important things about fotorbit.com
Visit fotorbit.comWe analyzed Fotorbit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
fotorbit.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value14.4 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value410 ms
66/100
30%
Value1.544
0/100
15%
Value10.5 s
23/100
10%
460 ms
1103 ms
213 ms
425 ms
640 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (74 requests) were addressed to the original Fotorbit.com, 7% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Multisite4.stintglobal.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Fotorbit.com.
Page size can be reduced by 407.1 kB (3%)
13.5 MB
13.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Fotorbit.com main page is 13.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 12.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 119.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.2 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fotorbit images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 20.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fotorbit.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (54%)
78
36
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fotorbit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fotorbit.com
460 ms
fotorbit.com
1103 ms
styles.css
213 ms
icomoon-the7-font.min.css
425 ms
fontello.min.css
640 ms
js_composer.min.css
856 ms
css
33 ms
main.min.css
884 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.css
659 ms
wpbakery.min.css
664 ms
post-type.min.css
667 ms
style.css
846 ms
css-vars.css
900 ms
custom.css
1114 ms
media.css
902 ms
mega-menu.css
1066 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
1068 ms
style.css
1085 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1098 ms
mystickyelements-front.min.css
1136 ms
intlTelInput.css
1276 ms
jquery.min.js
1295 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1308 ms
breeze-prefetch-links.min.js
1316 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
1334 ms
stripes.css
1422 ms
animate.min.css
1483 ms
css
36 ms
rs6.css
1492 ms
main.min.js
1736 ms
index.js
1531 ms
index.js
1552 ms
rbtools.min.js
1788 ms
rs6.min.js
2343 ms
legacy.min.js
1708 ms
jquery-mousewheel.min.js
1750 ms
custom-scrollbar.min.js
1773 ms
scripts.js
1925 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1949 ms
mystickyelements-fronted.min.js
1968 ms
intlTelInput.js
1795 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1593 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
1505 ms
underscore.min.js
1513 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
1529 ms
vc_grid.min.js
1558 ms
DSC_7236-1000x647-1-300x194.jpg
1148 ms
Logo-Approved-e1679144196926.png
947 ms
the7-chevron-down.svg
1021 ms
poster-1024x686.jpg
1433 ms
cover-photo-1024x686.jpg
1686 ms
cover-page-1024x688.jpg
1725 ms
holi-poster-2024.jpg
2660 ms
poster.jpg
1791 ms
POSTER-VARANASI.jpg
2028 ms
poster-1024x686.jpg
1651 ms
cover-page-1024x688.jpg
1869 ms
top_title_bgj.png
1904 ms
inle-lake_tania-Chatterjee_11.jpg
2386 ms
widow-holi_tania-chatterjee_1.jpg
2002 ms
ramnami_tania-chatterjee_10.jpg
2297 ms
bonda-tribe_tania-chatterjee_1.jpg
2340 ms
DSC_8699-1024x684.jpg
1593 ms
13.jpg
2265 ms
DSC_0416-300x209.jpg
1366 ms
novice-monk-of-myanmar_tania-chatterjee_11-e1586181046862.jpg
2175 ms
7-1024x697.jpg
2188 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
18 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
25 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
33 ms
rakher-upobash_tania-chatterjee_16-652x1024.jpg
2322 ms
theyyam_tania-chatterjee_1.jpg
2530 ms
devdiwali_taniachatterjee_13.jpg
2575 ms
pattankodali_tania-chatterjee_2.jpg
2606 ms
COVER-INDIAN-WRESTLERS-KOLHAPUR-1024x684.jpg
2280 ms
TANIA-CHATTERJEE_BISON-HORN-MARIA_4.jpg
2280 ms
varanasi-portrait_tania-chatterjee_3.jpg
2679 ms
DSC_2900lr.jpg
2452 ms
mask-dance-Recovered.jpg
2667 ms
1-1024x670.jpg
2325 ms
4.jpg
2373 ms
poster-150x150.jpg
2408 ms
cover-photo-150x150.jpg
2444 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
18 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
19 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
20 ms
fotorbit.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fotorbit.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fotorbit.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fotorbit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fotorbit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fotorbit.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fotorbit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: