1.1 sec in total
204 ms
705 ms
141 ms
Visit foxglovesecurity.com now to see the best up-to-date Foxglovesecurity content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foxglovesecurity.com
Visit foxglovesecurity.comWe analyzed Foxglovesecurity.com page load time and found that the first response time was 204 ms and then it took 846 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
foxglovesecurity.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.9 s
51/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value30 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.12
84/100
15%
Value3.7 s
90/100
10%
204 ms
9 ms
101 ms
101 ms
104 ms
Our browser made a total of 36 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foxglovesecurity.com, 25% (9 requests) were made to S1.wp.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to S2.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (240 ms) relates to the external source Use.typekit.net.
Page size can be reduced by 404.1 kB (74%)
544.8 kB
140.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Foxglovesecurity.com main page is 544.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 439.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foxglovesecurity images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 337.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 337.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foxglovesecurity.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (69%)
26
8
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foxglovesecurity. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foxglovesecurity.com
204 ms
webfont.js
9 ms
101 ms
global.css
101 ms
104 ms
s1.wp.com
100 ms
gprofiles.js
103 ms
wpgroho.js
103 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
101 ms
tiled-gallery.css
102 ms
111 ms
widgets.js
182 ms
100 ms
w.js
86 ms
css
95 ms
afq0ofh.js
240 ms
merriweather.css
8 ms
logo-orange3.png
117 ms
Zhfjj_gat3waL4JSju74EyUgqzV6nz08RafZ-3anoUw.woff
70 ms
WDf5lZYgdmmKhO8E1AQud_u8lE6UVUr6vjvFE2yXX0g.woff
83 ms
q0u6LFHwttnT_69euiDbWET9hOVMosk5-eakRiiKfEc.woff
83 ms
_fVr_XGln-cetWSUc-JpfCleH_YlhI-09Ouuhe8JZ5Y.woff
83 ms
Noticons.svg
68 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
42 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
67 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
80 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
80 ms
hovercard.css
61 ms
services.css
88 ms
g.gif
39 ms
g.gif
35 ms
g.gif
35 ms
d
134 ms
global-print.css
26 ms
botd.gif
77 ms
k++OjTb2CRcQEAAAA=
1 ms
foxglovesecurity.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Links do not have a discernible name
foxglovesecurity.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
foxglovesecurity.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxglovesecurity.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxglovesecurity.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foxglovesecurity.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foxglovesecurity. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: