14.6 sec in total
3.4 sec
10.4 sec
747 ms
Click here to check amazing Fpc Packaging content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fpcpackaging.com
ForeFront Packaging is the go to supply chain company to manage your packaging from design to production to packaging. Start with us today!
Visit fpcpackaging.comWe analyzed Fpcpackaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.4 sec and then it took 11.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
fpcpackaging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.8 s
0/100
10%
Value14.5 s
0/100
25%
Value28.6 s
0/100
10%
Value8,050 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.287
42/100
15%
Value20.5 s
2/100
10%
3410 ms
235 ms
158 ms
206 ms
285 ms
Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Fpcpackaging.com, 25% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Fpcpackaging.com.
Page size can be reduced by 64.7 kB (2%)
2.9 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Fpcpackaging.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 200 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fpc Packaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 19.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.6 kB or 19% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fpcpackaging.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (75%)
44
11
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fpc Packaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fpcpackaging.com
3410 ms
js
235 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
158 ms
style.min.css
206 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
285 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
293 ms
settings.css
285 ms
css
271 ms
css
295 ms
css
299 ms
css
280 ms
style.css
273 ms
css
278 ms
style-static.min.css
289 ms
style.css
268 ms
jetpack.css
351 ms
frontend-gtag.js
359 ms
jquery.min.js
363 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
358 ms
notbot.js
349 ms
loginbot.js
362 ms
et-core-unified-4.min.css
360 ms
font-awesome.min.css
191 ms
scripts.min.js
413 ms
scripts.js
360 ms
smoothscroll.js
358 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
406 ms
jquery.mobile.js
400 ms
magnific-popup.js
410 ms
easypiechart.js
399 ms
salvattore.js
409 ms
common.js
439 ms
motion-effects.js
642 ms
sticky-elements.js
643 ms
analytics.js
35 ms
collect
29 ms
style.css
191 ms
collect
99 ms
logo.png
109 ms
ctabg.jpg
110 ms
fpc01.jpg
541 ms
fpc04.jpg
114 ms
fpc02.jpg
492 ms
fpc16.jpg
463 ms
fpc03.jpg
490 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
355 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
354 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
382 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
380 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
381 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
378 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
380 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff
378 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
385 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
382 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs18NvgUI.woff
382 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1_FvgUI.woff
381 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vgUI.woff
381 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs169vsUZiYw.woff
381 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs13FvgUI.woff
417 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1y9ogUI.woff
417 ms
TK3_WkUHHAIjg75cFRf3bXL8LICs1xZogUI.woff
417 ms
modules.ttf
299 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
299 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
339 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
415 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
420 ms
api.min.js
289 ms
fpcpackaging.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fpcpackaging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
fpcpackaging.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fpcpackaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fpcpackaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fpcpackaging.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fpc Packaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: