Tools & Wizards About Us
froogal.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

froogal.in

Froogal - Customer Loyalty & Engagement Platform | Grow 10X Faster

Page Load Speed

19.3 sec in total

First Response

737 ms

Resources Loaded

18.1 sec

Page Rendered

486 ms

froogal.in screenshot

About Website

Visit froogal.in now to see the best up-to-date Froogal content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about froogal.in

Froogal empowers your brand with new way of loyalty to build greater customer lifetime value and meaningful relationships with your Customers. Froogal is one stop platform that enables you to use the ...

Visit froogal.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Froogal.in page load time and found that the first response time was 737 ms and then it took 18.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

froogal.in performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value46.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value35,120 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.452

20/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value47.3 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

froogal.in

737 ms

froogal.in

872 ms

www.froogal.in

855 ms

www.froogal.ai

2624 ms

js

90 ms

Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Froogal.in, 70% (62 requests) were made to Froogal.ai and 10% (9 requests) were made to Froogal-site-new.froogal.ai. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) relates to the external source Froogal.ai.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 448.6 kB (30%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Froogal.in main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 188.1 kB

  • Original 222.6 kB
  • After minification 222.5 kB
  • After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 260.0 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 798.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Froogal needs image optimization as it can save up to 260.0 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 429 B

  • Original 87.3 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB
  • After compression 86.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 121 B

  • Original 132.5 kB
  • After minification 132.5 kB
  • After compression 132.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Froogal.in has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 59 (79%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Froogal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

froogal.in

froogal.in

737 ms

froogal.in

froogal.in

872 ms

www.froogal.in

www.froogal.in

855 ms

www.froogal.ai

www.froogal.ai

2624 ms

js

js

90 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

828 ms

bdt-uikit.css

bdt-uikit.css

854 ms

ep-helper.css

ep-helper.css

850 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

862 ms

wpforms-full.min.css

wpforms-full.min.css

1130 ms

fontawesome-v5.2.0.css

fontawesome-v5.2.0.css

872 ms

common-layout-style.css

common-layout-style.css

1646 ms

grid-layout-style.css

grid-layout-style.css

1652 ms

masonry-layout-style.css

masonry-layout-style.css

1662 ms

metro-layout-style.css

metro-layout-style.css

1676 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

2207 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

2471 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

2465 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

2481 ms

post-50.css

post-50.css

2493 ms

uicore-global.css

uicore-global.css

3120 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

3026 ms

css

css

72 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

3287 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

3291 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

3289 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

3324 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

3838 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

3937 ms

custom.js

custom.js

4113 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

4102 ms

ep-advanced-icon-box.css

ep-advanced-icon-box.css

4096 ms

post-54.css

post-54.css

4186 ms

ultp.min.js

ultp.min.js

5165 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

4749 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

4909 ms

8870166.js

8870166.js

150 ms

uicore-global.js

uicore-global.js

4914 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

4963 ms

confetti.browser.min.js

confetti.browser.min.js

4942 ms

bdt-uikit.min.js

bdt-uikit.min.js

6335 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

5724 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

19 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

8 ms

collect

collect

25 ms

collect

collect

32 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

4945 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

4384 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

4941 ms

ep-confetti-effects.min.js

ep-confetti-effects.min.js

5129 ms

ep-advanced-icon-box.min.js

ep-advanced-icon-box.min.js

5176 ms

helper.min.js

helper.min.js

5411 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

4958 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

4430 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

5414 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

5199 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

5199 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

4952 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

4886 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

4933 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

4675 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

5232 ms

Collaboration-Platform-CTA-BG1.webp

Collaboration-Platform-CTA-BG1.webp

909 ms

Collaboration-Platform-CTA-BG2.webp

Collaboration-Platform-CTA-BG2.webp

1724 ms

rP2Cp2ywxg089UriASitCBimDnYU-Ck.ttf

rP2Cp2ywxg089UriASitCBimDnYU-Ck.ttf

156 ms

rP2Cp2ywxg089UriAWCrCBimDnYU-Ck.ttf

rP2Cp2ywxg089UriAWCrCBimDnYU-Ck.ttf

213 ms

rP2Hp2ywxg089UriCZOIGDWEBlw.ttf

rP2Hp2ywxg089UriCZOIGDWEBlw.ttf

248 ms

uicore-icons.ttf

uicore-icons.ttf

3695 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

3107 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

4508 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

3854 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

3907 ms

Full-Logo@3x.png

Full-Logo@3x.png

830 ms

collectedforms.js

collectedforms.js

53 ms

8870166.js

8870166.js

114 ms

conversations-embed.js

conversations-embed.js

49 ms

8870166.js

8870166.js

110 ms

fb.js

fb.js

45 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

1665 ms

Food-%E2%80%A2-Icon.svg

Food-%E2%80%A2-Icon.svg

831 ms

SaaS-Hero-Element-3.webp

SaaS-Hero-Element-3.webp

816 ms

Group-99765.png

Group-99765.png

847 ms

REtail-Icon.svg

REtail-Icon.svg

825 ms

Grocery-Icon.svg

Grocery-Icon.svg

821 ms

Apparel..-Icon.svg

Apparel..-Icon.svg

826 ms

fa-regular-400.svg

fa-regular-400.svg

993 ms

Wellness-Icon.svg

Wellness-Icon.svg

816 ms

Customer-%E2%80%A2-Mockup@2x.png

Customer-%E2%80%A2-Mockup@2x.png

2117 ms

Travel-Icon.svg

Travel-Icon.svg

1074 ms

Accessibility Review

froogal.in accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

froogal.in best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

froogal.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Froogal.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Froogal.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

froogal.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Froogal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: