20.7 sec in total
239 ms
20.3 sec
166 ms
Visit fropper.com now to see the best up-to-date Fropper content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fropper.com
Visit fropper.comWe analyzed Fropper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 20.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
fropper.com performance score
239 ms
233 ms
146 ms
145 ms
120 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fropper.com, 83% (57 requests) were made to Img.fropper.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to I.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source R.zapak.com.
Page size can be reduced by 203.5 kB (11%)
1.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Fropper.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.5 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fropper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 131.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 131.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fropper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 17.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (44%)
63
35
The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fropper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.fropper.com
239 ms
zones-style.css
233 ms
top-nav.css
146 ms
ajax-framework.js
145 ms
home-page-login.js
120 ms
top-nav.js
300 ms
gpt.js
62 ms
2.jpg
90 ms
gmsimages.php
18839 ms
2.jpg
120 ms
2.jpg
121 ms
top-bg.gif
122 ms
zones-inner-logo.gif
122 ms
login-lft.gif
122 ms
login-bg.gif
123 ms
search-button.gif
161 ms
search-icon.gif
160 ms
login-rgt.gif
195 ms
login-go.gif
211 ms
error.gif
211 ms
regi-bg.gif
211 ms
rel-bn-bg.gif
235 ms
nav-bg.gif
230 ms
nav-lft.gif
333 ms
seprator-01.gif
327 ms
tab-lft-01.gif
367 ms
tab-bg-01.gif
331 ms
heart.png
370 ms
tab-rgt-01.gif
365 ms
nav-rgt.gif
426 ms
nav-div-bg.gif
430 ms
content-div-lft.gif
487 ms
content-div-rgt.gif
482 ms
content-div-bg.gif
483 ms
gaganbadwalchd-G9BkEW.jpg
484 ms
preeyaCAP-2fAq9M.jpg
539 ms
chandhiniChn-ofroYo.jpg
544 ms
AnisahNazQureshi24-aJhoU3.jpg
598 ms
desent29-bs9EYU.jpg
600 ms
sachin_rocx2000-ZWgLbm.jpg
604 ms
Riidz209-etMeYy.jpg
605 ms
NikkiRao-b4Oau9.jpg
655 ms
purwarsaurabh-94raTH.jpg
661 ms
sagarbittu.jpg
688 ms
mumbai6852-rshgzp.jpg
681 ms
arunava_mca-uHTZ2F.jpg
716 ms
gmsimages.php
18821 ms
gmsimages.php
19615 ms
ga.js
55 ms
blog-comments.gif
694 ms
pubads_impl_83.js
82 ms
__utm.gif
45 ms
DraculVanHelsing.jpg
642 ms
dagnysharma.jpg
662 ms
4152-BWO.jpg
658 ms
container.html
20 ms
6979-cqX.gif
663 ms
6950-tyd.jpg
662 ms
11-csE.jpg
658 ms
ishan2102-ShJ-578992.jpg
665 ms
kingnareshCAP-NoW-576114.jpg
690 ms
speedkunal-Rqs-584056.jpg
691 ms
rajputkhan-W6V-565134.jpg
752 ms
main-page-fropper-ad-300x250.png
1062 ms
arw.gif
687 ms
testimonial-bg.gif
649 ms
relationships-banner.gif
820 ms
deloitte-2007.gif
683 ms
pcworld-bn.gif
735 ms
fropper.com SEO score
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fropper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fropper.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
fropper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fropper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: