14.6 sec in total
4.3 sec
9.8 sec
490 ms
Click here to check amazing Futurehead content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futurehead.com
New and future developments in science & technology. Cutting-edge news and opinion. The future starts here.
Visit futurehead.comWe analyzed Futurehead.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.3 sec and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
futurehead.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.2 s
78/100
10%
Value2.2 s
94/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
4301 ms
181 ms
655 ms
183 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 123 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Futurehead.com, 16% (20 requests) were made to Feeds.feedburner.com and 8% (10 requests) were made to Wms.assoc-amazon.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Futurehead.com.
Page size can be reduced by 467.5 kB (40%)
1.2 MB
692.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Futurehead.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 557.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.4 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurehead images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 272.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 272.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurehead.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (63%)
112
42
The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurehead. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.futurehead.com
4301 ms
comments.css
181 ms
mootools.js
655 ms
caption.js
183 ms
ratings.js
192 ms
template_css.css
372 ms
ja.script.js
374 ms
ja-sosdmenu.css
383 ms
ja.cssmenu.js
298 ms
default.css
389 ms
editor_content.css
403 ms
mod_jw_ucd.css
409 ms
ajaxfader.js
407 ms
q
275 ms
show_ads.js
4 ms
rssfactory.js
102 ms
rss_css.css
137 ms
Mushroom-composite--012.jpg
406 ms
140203093521-large.jpg
31 ms
anl_photosynthesis.jpg
194 ms
twitter-a.png
34 ms
feed-icon16x16.png
29 ms
add.gif
30 ms
130
265 ms
pixel.gif
149 ms
diffusionradio
59 ms
130
243 ms
diffusionradio
77 ms
diffusionradio
82 ms
diffusionradio
115 ms
diffusionradio
211 ms
diffusionradio
114 ms
diffusionradio
227 ms
diffusionradio
91 ms
diffusionradio
114 ms
diffusionradio
124 ms
30IKJh4dXak
125 ms
diffusionradio
161 ms
diffusionradio
162 ms
AhCeW9KHYQg
138 ms
diffusionradio
172 ms
diffusionradio
184 ms
XIZC4uXtgC8
173 ms
diffusionradio
212 ms
diffusionradio
218 ms
3dfKq38Sfj0
199 ms
bullet-list.gif
110 ms
logo.gif
109 ms
user-decrease.gif
109 ms
user-reset.gif
112 ms
user-increase.gif
112 ms
buzz.gif
113 ms
delicious.gif
210 ms
digg.gif
200 ms
facebook.gif
199 ms
friendfeed.gif
204 ms
linkedin.gif
211 ms
myspace.gif
210 ms
posterous.gif
293 ms
reddit.gif
292 ms
squidoo.gif
311 ms
stumbleupon.gif
308 ms
twitter.gif
303 ms
exp1.gif
305 ms
Brain-006.jpg
408 ms
icon-search.gif
372 ms
header2.jpg
389 ms
140203093521-large.jpg
104 ms
5857
32 ms
ucd_content_1.txt
384 ms
mainwrap-bg1.gif
359 ms
arrow.png
367 ms
sep.gif
366 ms
star_blue.png
434 ms
sep.gif
466 ms
h3-bg.gif
453 ms
8001_6.js
995 ms
custom.material.heartx299.jpg
174 ms
popup.js
83 ms
nifty.js
163 ms
colors.js
166 ms
ca-pub-2737535374457727.js
136 ms
zrt_lookup.html
30 ms
show_ads_impl.js
51 ms
130
239 ms
130
241 ms
overlib_mini.js
353 ms
ads
383 ms
osd.js
26 ms
ads
284 ms
ads
204 ms
abg.js
20 ms
ads
255 ms
m_js_controller.js
4 ms
ga.js
56 ms
favicon
84 ms
s
62 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
78 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
54 ms
x_button_blue2.png
62 ms
favicon
79 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
11 ms
css
68 ms
nessie_icon_magazine_black.png
16 ms
nessie_icon_magazine_white.png
4 ms
ir
2175 ms
290 ms
widgets.css
164 ms
q
235 ms
ui
25 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
38 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
41 ms
41e1oNGqtNL._SL75_.jpg
24 ms
star45_tpng.png
82 ms
star40_tpng.png
83 ms
amazon-logo-b_tpng.png
83 ms
btn-get-widget_tpng.png
153 ms
bg4_tpng.png
159 ms
51stXjIOG5L._SL75_.jpg
18 ms
51AUrVvxCnL._SL75_.jpg
39 ms
513pj3ro%2BjL._SL75_.jpg
27 ms
activeview
13 ms
futurehead.com accessibility score
futurehead.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
futurehead.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurehead.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurehead.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurehead.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurehead. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: