Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    53% of websites

futureprnt.com

Home - Star EMEA

Page Load Speed

15 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

13 sec

Page Rendered

316 ms

futureprnt.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Futureprnt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futureprnt.com

Manufacturer of point of sale Hardware thermal and dot matrix receipt printers, ticket, barcode and label printers for the retail and hospitality industries.

Visit futureprnt.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Futureprnt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 13.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futureprnt.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.128

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futureprnt.com

1595 ms

language-selector.css

89 ms

language-selector-click.css

165 ms

styles.css

169 ms

css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 60% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Futureprnt.com, 17% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to Urban-test.co.uk. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Futureprnt.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 627.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

966.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Futureprnt.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 821.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.0 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 40.9 kB
  • After compression 8.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 821.0 kB
  • After minification 813.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futureprnt images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 273.6 kB

  • Original 375.6 kB
  • After minification 334.6 kB
  • After compression 102.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 273.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 311.4 kB

  • Original 354.7 kB
  • After minification 318.0 kB
  • After compression 43.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futureprnt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 311.4 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

18

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futureprnt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

futureprnt.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

futureprnt.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

futureprnt.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futureprnt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futureprnt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futureprnt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: