Tools & Wizards About Us
futurepruf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

futurepruf.com

futureprüf – Content Strategy Design Development // San Francisco Bay Area, California Web Responsive CMS

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

596 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

2.7 sec

futurepruf.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to futurepruf.com homepage info - get ready to check Futurepruf best content right away, or after learning these important things about futurepruf.com

Visit futurepruf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Futurepruf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futurepruf.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

15/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futurepruf.com

596 ms

analytics.js

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

61 ms

style.css

97 ms

image-placeholder.png

1908 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Futurepruf.com, 23% (3 requests) were made to 7e3a2261736abba245fb-32372ea96dcf1b410ffa15b2243dc6d0.r60.cf2.rackcdn.com and 15% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source 7e3a2261736abba245fb-32372ea96dcf1b410ffa15b2243dc6d0.r60.cf2.rackcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 173.2 kB (60%)

Content Size

289.9 kB

After Optimization

116.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Futurepruf.com main page is 289.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 111.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 63.7 kB

  • Original 75.6 kB
  • After minification 71.5 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 64.9 kB
  • After minification 64.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Futurepruf images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 76.9 kB

  • Original 111.2 kB
  • After minification 104.9 kB
  • After compression 34.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 32.5 kB

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 25.6 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurepruf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (33%)

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

8

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futurepruf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

futurepruf.com

futurepruf.com

596 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

23 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

61 ms

style.css

style.css

97 ms

image-placeholder.png

image-placeholder.png

1908 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

54 ms

global.js

global.js

122 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

67 ms

collect

collect

12 ms

leader-background-pattern.png

leader-background-pattern.png

472 ms

leader-background-1.png

leader-background-1.png

474 ms

icon-navigation_main.svg

icon-navigation_main.svg

468 ms

futurepruf-webfont.woff

futurepruf-webfont.woff

80 ms

Accessibility Review

futurepruf.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

futurepruf.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

futurepruf.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurepruf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futurepruf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

futurepruf.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futurepruf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: