4.9 sec in total
331 ms
4.2 sec
383 ms
Welcome to futuretap.com homepage info - get ready to check Future Tap best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about futuretap.com
Visit futuretap.comWe analyzed Futuretap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 331 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
futuretap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value340 ms
74/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value19.6 s
2/100
10%
331 ms
1936 ms
229 ms
313 ms
8 ms
Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Futuretap.com, 6% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net and 6% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Futuretap.com.
Page size can be reduced by 688.9 kB (29%)
2.3 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Futuretap.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 43% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Future Tap images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 330.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 330.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 216.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futuretap.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 216.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (64%)
45
16
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Tap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
futuretap.com
331 ms
www.futuretap.com
1936 ms
language-selector.css
229 ms
jquery-ui.css
313 ms
slick.css
8 ms
slick-theme.css
12 ms
foundation-icons.css
319 ms
app.css
708 ms
stt.min.css
214 ms
jquery.js
513 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
325 ms
modernizr.js
544 ms
addtwitterfield.js
417 ms
483 ms
jquery.min.js
690 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
83 ms
foundation.min.js
726 ms
TweenMax.min.js
39 ms
jquery.cookie.js
497 ms
slick.min.js
45 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
531 ms
jquery.scrollTo-min.js
562 ms
jquery.localscroll-min.js
609 ms
app-min.js
688 ms
jquery-vimeoEmbedder-min.js
688 ms
platform.js
98 ms
cookieconsent-min.js
723 ms
sitepress.js
761 ms
135 ms
all.js
159 ms
apple-touch-icon_normal.png
28 ms
bg-stripes.png
415 ms
bg-home-base.jpg
131 ms
futuretap-logo@2x.png
130 ms
WhereTo-en-Hero.png
754 ms
ImgHead@2x.png
1166 ms
Icon-Streets-260-transparent.png
183 ms
twitter-logo@2x.png
236 ms
widgets.js
105 ms
5V4BgzrIQHOGAnnNBzER6Sb8Ij8gMdPLdGDcdc9bEDOu917XzlPC9ftbe+R9NrIbc40qGQI4NhLnh+937VLLfmMYw5o8WGDRvn9017rFSeGVWojyl4s1Zbo3Nj6fxn7JJ6S7XuxwxfhtFQVm1XN07ZzPzV5wlIcketAHicY2BiwA84gJiRgYmRiZGZkYWRlZGNvTQv083AwABCm1uCaUNDI6i4KYh2BcoDAOnwCww=
34 ms
301 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
118 ms
112 ms
xd_arbiter.php
129 ms
xd_arbiter.php
231 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
44 ms
jot
84 ms
cc.css
117 ms
xd_arbiter.php
82 ms
futuretap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
futuretap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
futuretap.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futuretap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futuretap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futuretap.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Future Tap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: