2.8 sec in total
46 ms
2.1 sec
573 ms
Visit sites.faithlife.com now to see the best up-to-date Sites Faithlife content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sites.faithlife.com
Visit sites.faithlife.comWe analyzed Sites.faithlife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 46 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
sites.faithlife.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.9 s
10/100
10%
Value11.1 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value2,470 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.032
100/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
46 ms
58 ms
311 ms
262 ms
64 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Sites.faithlife.com, 13% (6 requests) were made to Styles1.faithlifecdn.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Files.logoscdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (515 ms) relates to the external source Api.reftagger.com.
Page size can be reduced by 179.3 kB (13%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Sites.faithlife.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 147.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 55.7 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 147.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sites Faithlife images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 31.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 76 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sites.faithlife.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (79%)
34
7
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sites Faithlife. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
sites.faithlife.com
46 ms
sites.faithlife.com
58 ms
transition-faq
311 ms
autosignin
262 ms
cookies
64 ms
transition-faq
170 ms
faithlife.squish.4980ad43b85c423f66b5.css
135 ms
content
190 ms
browser-start.d99ff11ca72f2011013e.css
93 ms
shared.414815bd51f4024d2b8b.js
184 ms
browser-start.4dde6d2ac59f50f5f507.js
250 ms
vendors~universal-header.d6145d9cc21e9c618b05.js
109 ms
universal-header.432e44b95a756e401ff7.js
109 ms
RefTagger.js
515 ms
api.js
183 ms
credentials
88 ms
jquery-3.6.1.min.js
97 ms
content
183 ms
content
246 ms
4734512.js
246 ms
content.svg
143 ms
optimized
144 ms
ai.2.min.js
190 ms
amplitude-4.5.0-min.gz.js
234 ms
gtm.js
288 ms
recaptcha__en.js
221 ms
SourceSansPro-Regular.otf.woff
86 ms
SourceSansPro-Light.otf.woff
84 ms
SourceSansPro-Semibold.otf.woff
124 ms
SourceSansPro-Italic.otf.woff
403 ms
SourceSansPro-LightItalic.otf.woff
124 ms
4734512.js
293 ms
collectedforms.js
205 ms
fb.js
203 ms
banner.js
291 ms
js
85 ms
9245.js
183 ms
oktrk.js
202 ms
iMAWebCookie.js
220 ms
insight.min.js
195 ms
evergage.min.js
195 ms
roundtrip.js
186 ms
li_sync
28 ms
li_sync
12 ms
s.js
24 ms
KRWHVXBX2NERTGUPKKFB6I
22 ms
250216.gif
51 ms
PZX45MZNJ5AOBNJVG4D7DN.js
4 ms
sites.faithlife.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
sites.faithlife.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
sites.faithlife.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sites.faithlife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sites.faithlife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
sites.faithlife.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Sites Faithlife. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: