8.9 sec in total
282 ms
8.3 sec
305 ms
Welcome to gefix.fr homepage info - get ready to check Gefix best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about gefix.fr
Visit gefix.frWe analyzed Gefix.fr page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 8.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
gefix.fr performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value7.5 s
26/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value9.8 s
28/100
10%
282 ms
4634 ms
423 ms
302 ms
366 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Gefix.fr, 93% (53 requests) were made to Static-www.gefix.fr and 2% (1 request) were made to Module-videodesk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gefix.fr.
Page size can be reduced by 487.7 kB (22%)
2.2 MB
1.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Gefix.fr main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 150.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 68.3 kB, which is 41% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.9 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gefix images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 129.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 129.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 190.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gefix.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 190.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (21%)
48
38
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gefix. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gefix.fr
282 ms
www.gefix.fr
4634 ms
jquery.min.js
423 ms
jquery.cookie.js
302 ms
bootstrap.min.css
366 ms
bootstrap-theme.min.css
302 ms
base.css
295 ms
whirly.css
301 ms
theme.css
394 ms
font.css
405 ms
select2-bootstrap.css
403 ms
bootstrap.min.js
419 ms
underscore.js
484 ms
bg_header.jpg
221 ms
gefix_logo.png
156 ms
ea3f8c7d70400f76d7312106088d824ef161cd22.jpg
729 ms
afea9302f02870e5deecb77cdc87b1960b0af608.jpg
370 ms
fa4d9bf5c7c626e8220e7dd320b6dcf0dfd95fcd.jpg
744 ms
89fb0859736e77a8c9d32185b8965349b02fe1fa.jpg
758 ms
af2c8242b4fdfa76f71c81d5e86a3292f56fb1bd.jpg
349 ms
6befa47768db52e0b75d3efe6f8036ac139b75ef.jpg
388 ms
b2c5c50a0acff6f6d585658236f516fcd551edad.jpg
481 ms
7d7c25f72560f983a1ac34b7a0434854121a5e20.jpg
568 ms
5e7a62194944fafcbd075f15c937c89f2f8fec18.jpg
547 ms
11f8849bda7affa36ace80a2512f8db0fafa16ae.jpg
627 ms
a2ae29b0ee74fd45ea37c3cb0acdf0364bdbfdd5.jpg
717 ms
98ba0c8db8b438c60e6527046593c2a0c7cfcd06.jpg
705 ms
a14235f41cd49fbc471fa014eba0538369a0092e.jpg
755 ms
71fe4578f7e5a4f7e1848751099c92fc5f9413c2.jpg
804 ms
d4eda676606423c37a81c670ecdf3059eec8aebf.jpg
865 ms
84b47c5f06c2f717138614496f6be5951b8aba8c.jpg
849 ms
0bf12dfc99d2d2c1d5505f394c4620ebc6d75509.jpg
883 ms
ed555becf596d66b4304e15f948c611a7c4b9038.jpg
888 ms
a56eeaf1f0772a475739ebcc370595c48fb28051.jpg
887 ms
697a18a65201af17ffbeff5ca41287926711340b.jpg
2421 ms
836f7bff23aa9b70d910e591f43ee06261769338.jpg
995 ms
0a2e7aa9280a0d02cf53d79293d41e92d458ae97.jpg
994 ms
037570cb06a25cb651c6577cec6f65045e8d5142.jpg
1033 ms
65c88238be69194b043131d77f2d509c9e679395.jpg
1033 ms
2480e8c85d27c143724594d36fa8791bf52d00ab.jpg
1044 ms
044e43858e87b087aa3f3e7a2875e34af728669f.jpg
1136 ms
fe8087385be174b3e7ebaceca2fb9cbc3e1179c8.jpg
1171 ms
a0e3d7bd994600260bd8d9c3d2bd9cab5d60ec2f.jpg
1170 ms
67dbef92b231433e855cd4848e7b8b4780fb662b.jpg
1189 ms
ad60bd44ec37128c15692da244a4f42c66dfbe40.jpg
1170 ms
bepo-powered.png
1244 ms
djangomade124x25.gif
1279 ms
videodesk.js
100 ms
background-low.jpg
2285 ms
proximanova-light-webfont.woff
1241 ms
proximanova-regular-webfont.woff
1301 ms
icomoon.ttf
1180 ms
icomoon.woff
1088 ms
proximanova-semibold-webfont.woff
1287 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
1249 ms
proximanova-bold-webfont.woff
1205 ms
get_module.php
459 ms
gefix.fr accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
gefix.fr best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gefix.fr SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a valid hreflang
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gefix.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gefix.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gefix.fr
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gefix. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: