5.9 sec in total
438 ms
4.9 sec
540 ms
Click here to check amazing Geilo Laft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about geilolaft.no
Fjellhytter med solide dimensjoner, utsøkte detaljer og en suveren kvalitet. Les mer! ✅ Tradisjonell og moderne design ✅ Bindingsverk ✅ Stavlaft ✅ Håndlaft
Visit geilolaft.noWe analyzed Geilolaft.no page load time and found that the first response time was 438 ms and then it took 5.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
geilolaft.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value24.2 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value2,130 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.439
21/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
438 ms
2102 ms
231 ms
347 ms
467 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Geilolaft.no, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Geilolaft.no.
Page size can be reduced by 124.1 kB (2%)
5.0 MB
4.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Geilolaft.no main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 137 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Geilo Laft images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 194 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geilolaft.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (81%)
69
13
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geilo Laft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 39 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
geilolaft.no
438 ms
geilolaft.no
2102 ms
grid.css
231 ms
base.css
347 ms
layout.css
467 ms
blog.css
375 ms
postslider.css
356 ms
buttons.css
356 ms
comments.css
360 ms
slideshow.css
460 ms
gallery.css
471 ms
gallery_horizontal.css
471 ms
grid_row.css
478 ms
heading.css
489 ms
hr.css
575 ms
icon.css
578 ms
image.css
584 ms
image_hotspots.css
584 ms
masonry_entries.css
591 ms
avia-snippet-site-preloader.css
602 ms
promobox.css
689 ms
slideshow_accordion.css
693 ms
social_share.css
697 ms
tabs.css
698 ms
testimonials.css
710 ms
toggles.css
722 ms
video.css
803 ms
style.min.css
809 ms
styles.css
814 ms
shortcodes.css
816 ms
avia-snippet-fold-unfold.css
822 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
834 ms
avia-snippet-lightbox.css
915 ms
avia-snippet-widget.css
922 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
931 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
930 ms
geilo_laft.css
1052 ms
api.js
42 ms
custom.css
848 ms
style.css
811 ms
avia-snippet-cookieconsent.css
699 ms
post-13.css
699 ms
jquery.min.js
815 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
713 ms
avia-head-scripts-88f307861d1b26ca1fd07d7593f5cb24---64f060e5f0f74.js
781 ms
index.js
699 ms
index.js
699 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
751 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
842 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
808 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
798 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
710 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
728 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
721 ms
index.js
799 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
797 ms
avia-footer-scripts-845ac56c65f7f6cf6f75d31778f08f8a---64f060e655d89.js
1031 ms
gtm.js
78 ms
2022-11-01-geilo-laft-standard-hyttemodell-Lia-3D-render-scaled.jpg
947 ms
P196-geilo-laft-hytte-peis-GLL-12191-845x321.jpg
645 ms
maiandra-bold.ttf
283 ms
calibri.ttf
622 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
404 ms
analytics.js
39 ms
collect
17 ms
collect
30 ms
js
46 ms
ga-audiences
117 ms
Logo.png
154 ms
Geilo-Laft-Logo_Signatur_BRUN-FRILAGD-H156px-300x43.png
269 ms
geilo-laft-hytte-modell-Hallingskarvet-GLL-14640-1030x507.jpg
692 ms
P103-geilo-laft-bygge-hytte-GLL-14992-1030x507.jpg
698 ms
P209-geilo-laft-nokkelferdig-hytta-GLL-12848-1030x507.jpg
354 ms
geilo-laft-Solbakken-Hyttegrend-GLL-11264.jpg
125 ms
geilolaft.no accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
geilolaft.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
geilolaft.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geilolaft.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Geilolaft.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
geilolaft.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Geilo Laft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: