3 sec in total
221 ms
2.5 sec
191 ms
Visit giblink.com now to see the best up-to-date GIBLINK content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about giblink.com
GIBLINK Business Links provides you the resources and information that you need to start and grow an online business or market an existing business online.
Visit giblink.comWe analyzed Giblink.com page load time and found that the first response time was 221 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
giblink.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.7 s
0/100
10%
Value17.4 s
0/100
25%
Value11.7 s
4/100
10%
Value1,880 ms
9/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value18.4 s
3/100
10%
221 ms
476 ms
28 ms
85 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Giblink.com, 31% (18 requests) were made to Cdn.lynxdigital.com and 17% (10 requests) were made to Lynxdigital.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.lynxdigital.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (68%)
1.5 MB
489.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Giblink.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 696.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 242.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, GIBLINK needs image optimization as it can save up to 242.7 kB or 58% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 465.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 465.0 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 312.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giblink.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 312.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (81%)
48
9
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GIBLINK. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
giblink.com
221 ms
giblink
476 ms
ti.js
28 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
85 ms
flick.css
179 ms
www.lynxdigital.com
1044 ms
styles.css
162 ms
settings.css
168 ms
fonts.css
290 ms
animations.css
355 ms
foundation.css
541 ms
style.css
216 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
207 ms
jetpack.css
200 ms
LYxLDoAgDAUvBDSGhRfxAqSilrRU-Sy8vRLdTd68jId09Vhu43-wQnsJLTqhbCaQQIwHyQmpQsWizIu-O2puAZvdtIidgTJyX2Mdr6_jhhmRBw.js
699 ms
M9TPTczMSc7IzC3QzypGcHSM9Usz9ZPzi1L1cjPzdAxRlaUklqQWZCZnpxYBAA.js
652 ms
M9RPTCnKL0ksSdXPyUwqSiyq1M8qLE0tqtSDieulVOalF-WXFgAA.js
571 ms
lctBDoAwCETRC5kSj4QtSalYFKiJt1cXHsDt_HkzYDENDALhxdAuaMcgu9K3pyyc1zDMK9k0g9HpwoUM9rE8CdCdwqH5J6PSRvvouaZQFU8b97_wOauMYO2vvgE.js
875 ms
wop.css
233 ms
M9RPzs8rSUwu0U3LL8rVNdfPzEvOKU1JLdbPKtYvTi7KLCgpBgA.js
656 ms
BcEBDoAgCAXQExnrRK4hOSrxC3j_3jtpbeW34OqCGVlcmrpwFny7q9ETtACvt09LsVaDXZHHUPsB.js
737 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
6 ms
M9BPy0ksKc7PTdXPKtbPzU9JLcrLrCrSMUARh7F1C3JK0zPzigE.js
1115 ms
M9BPy0ksKc7PTdXPKoazdUsyUnNTdUz0k_Nzc1PzSnSLUgtyKvVyM_OAYuUFuqm5SakpIC4A.js
790 ms
M9TPSi0pSEzO1s_NTynNSS3WL85ILEpNSUxJqQQzM_PSAQ.js
806 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
analytics.js
74 ms
trans-paper.fw_.png
471 ms
logo-med.fw_.png
537 ms
giblink-logo.png
470 ms
digital-wallpaper-4.jpg
468 ms
linkid.js
20 ms
p
70 ms
aM6tjYU3Gr45rXacwqm_6r.js
309 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
61 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
64 ms
wkfQbvfT_02e2IWO3yYueQ.woff
310 ms
BVtM30trf7q_jfqYeHfjtA.woff
311 ms
icomoon.woff
383 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzHhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
309 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
309 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTXhCUOGz7vYGh680lGh-uXM.woff
306 ms
Genericons.svg
310 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
3 ms
collect
319 ms
collect
325 ms
share
130 ms
g.gif
111 ms
count.json
110 ms
graph.facebook.com
192 ms
g.gif
99 ms
g.gif
99 ms
v2
94 ms
g.gif
27 ms
dpx
9 ms
xrefid.xgi
6 ms
52154.gif
8 ms
nr-885.min.js
16 ms
giblink.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
giblink.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
giblink.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giblink.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giblink.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
giblink.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GIBLINK. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: