3.7 sec in total
914 ms
2.4 sec
389 ms
Welcome to gifse.in homepage info - get ready to check Gifse best content right away, or after learning these important things about gifse.in
GIFSE Since commencing in 2011, GIFSE has trained more than 1,000 professionals in a wide range of Health, Safety, Security, Environment and Management.
Visit gifse.inWe analyzed Gifse.in page load time and found that the first response time was 914 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
gifse.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value25.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value540 ms
54/100
30%
Value0.411
24/100
15%
Value8.7 s
36/100
10%
914 ms
153 ms
160 ms
304 ms
162 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Gifse.in, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (914 ms) belongs to the original domain Gifse.in.
Page size can be reduced by 198.0 kB (14%)
1.4 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gifse.in main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 856.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gifse images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.2 kB or 22% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gifse.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.3 kB or 26% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (88%)
65
8
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gifse. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gifse.in
914 ms
style.min.css
153 ms
chaty-front.min.css
160 ms
js_composer.min.css
304 ms
bootstrap.min.css
162 ms
base.min.css
231 ms
footer-widget-collapse.min.css
165 ms
footer-base.min.css
228 ms
opt-lazy-load.min.css
227 ms
wp-gutenberg.min.css
237 ms
wpb-int-mc4wp.min.css
237 ms
int-revolution-slider.min.css
330 ms
int-wpbakery-base.min.css
331 ms
style.css
333 ms
header-base.min.css
334 ms
mod-tools.min.css
335 ms
header-el-base.min.css
381 ms
el-social-icons.min.css
382 ms
page-title.min.css
382 ms
el-section-title.min.css
384 ms
el-responsive-text.min.css
385 ms
wpb-el-banner.min.css
386 ms
el-info-box.min.css
460 ms
opt-scrolltotop.min.css
458 ms
opt-header-banner.min.css
458 ms
opt-promo-popup.min.css
460 ms
lib-magnific-popup.min.css
462 ms
opt-sticky-social.min.css
462 ms
xts-header_715004-1632603921.css
535 ms
xts-theme_settings_default-1632603427.css
545 ms
css
51 ms
jquery.min.js
542 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
537 ms
device.min.js
539 ms
css
14 ms
font-awesome.css
485 ms
v4-shims.min.css
593 ms
all.min.css
593 ms
animate.min.css
593 ms
rs6.css
504 ms
cht-front-script.min.js
563 ms
rbtools.min.js
561 ms
rs6.min.js
688 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
498 ms
cookie.min.js
499 ms
helpers.min.js
493 ms
woocommerceNotices.min.js
599 ms
headerBuilder.min.js
597 ms
menuOffsets.min.js
508 ms
menuSetUp.min.js
503 ms
lazyLoading.min.js
503 ms
waypoints.min.js
597 ms
animationsOffset.min.js
596 ms
footer.min.js
596 ms
scrollTop.min.js
549 ms
mobileNavigation.min.js
548 ms
headerBanner.min.js
552 ms
magnific-popup.min.js
592 ms
promoPopup.min.js
589 ms
stickySocialButtons.min.js
587 ms
image_processing.gif
838 ms
Gifse-logo.jpg
386 ms
dummy.png
469 ms
payments.png
469 ms
offer.jpg
763 ms
woodmart-font.woff
401 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
98 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
98 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
99 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
390 ms
whatsapp.png
80 ms
gifse.in accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gifse.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gifse.in SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gifse.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gifse.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gifse.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gifse. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: