5.2 sec in total
691 ms
4.1 sec
369 ms
Welcome to giganticsigns.com homepage info - get ready to check Gigantic Signs best content right away, or after learning these important things about giganticsigns.com
Advertise your business by taking advantage of the quality signage solutions offered by Gigantic Signs. Contact us on +61 8 8362 5455 TODAY!
Visit giganticsigns.comWe analyzed Giganticsigns.com page load time and found that the first response time was 691 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
giganticsigns.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.7 s
5/100
10%
Value5.9 s
14/100
25%
Value10.0 s
9/100
10%
Value4,920 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.048
99/100
15%
Value16.8 s
5/100
10%
691 ms
267 ms
503 ms
507 ms
511 ms
Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Giganticsigns.com, 3% (1 request) were made to Twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Giganticsigns.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 72.9 kB (16%)
467.7 kB
394.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Giganticsigns.com main page is 467.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 372.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 207 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gigantic Signs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giganticsigns.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.8 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (17%)
29
24
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gigantic Signs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.giganticsigns.com.au
691 ms
ModuleStyleSheets.css
267 ms
style.css
503 ms
twitter.js
507 ms
Box.css
511 ms
Java_Box.js
506 ms
Java_DynMenus.js
538 ms
Java_DynMenusSelected.js
542 ms
ValidationFunctions.js
1014 ms
top.gif
267 ms
top_mid.gif
763 ms
gigantic-signs-logo.gif
264 ms
grey_bg.jpg
267 ms
ArrowMenuRight.gif
901 ms
rotator_van.jpg
1620 ms
focus5.jpg
1021 ms
focus4.jpg
1021 ms
viewgallery.jpg
730 ms
captchahandler.ashx
993 ms
bus-opt-side.png
1016 ms
contactnow.gif
1171 ms
twitter.jpg
1239 ms
popai.jpg
1267 ms
property.jpg
1275 ms
isa.jpg
1273 ms
asga.jpg
2307 ms
bg_start.jpg
1473 ms
bg.jpg
1483 ms
sideright_bg_orange.gif
1495 ms
sideright_bg.gif
1483 ms
GiganticSigns.json
256 ms
ValidationFunctions.aspx
1275 ms
giganticsigns.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
giganticsigns.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
giganticsigns.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giganticsigns.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giganticsigns.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
giganticsigns.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gigantic Signs. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: