6.4 sec in total
1.7 sec
4.4 sec
403 ms
Visit gildedfork.com now to see the best up-to-date Gilded Fork content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gildedfork.com
Digital food magazine & home of the world's 1st food podcast channel, launched in 2005. Recipes, ingredient profiles, food writing, travel, food podcasts.
Visit gildedfork.comWe analyzed Gildedfork.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
gildedfork.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value13.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
1650 ms
26 ms
50 ms
52 ms
5 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Gildedfork.com, 6% (7 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 6% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Gildedfork.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (42%)
2.8 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Gildedfork.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 224.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.8 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gilded Fork images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 872.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 872.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gildedfork.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (61%)
93
36
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gilded Fork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
gildedfork.com
1650 ms
style.css
26 ms
layout.css
50 ms
custom.css
52 ms
shareaholic.js
5 ms
show_ads.js
5 ms
wp-embed.min.js
92 ms
bounce
10 ms
bounce
10 ms
bounce
10 ms
gpt.js
41 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
69 ms
gourmetads-logo.jpg
299 ms
back.png
54 ms
my-nav-sprite.png
53 ms
logo.png
298 ms
chocolate_intro.png
299 ms
chocolate-caramel-tart.jpg
298 ms
thumb.php
1403 ms
thumb.php
1065 ms
thumb.php
1619 ms
thumb.php
1633 ms
thumb.php
1907 ms
thumb.php
1879 ms
thumb.php
2100 ms
thumb.php
2227 ms
thumb.php
2627 ms
thumb.php
2616 ms
sdb_cookbook0513.png
1930 ms
sdb_recipes0513.jpg
1995 ms
sdb_dinnerparties.jpg
1990 ms
gflogo-white.png
2016 ms
7e52000e7ad1d4c58c5cef36e2a9b3cf.json
46 ms
shrMain.min.js
17 ms
pubads_impl_82.js
83 ms
ca-pub-7762244299293771.js
127 ms
zrt_lookup.html
209 ms
show_ads_impl.js
88 ms
jquery.min.js
170 ms
container.html
192 ms
ads
272 ms
ga.js
156 ms
osd.js
64 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
pageview.gif
52 ms
__utm.gif
28 ms
m_js_controller.js
51 ms
abg.js
72 ms
app.js
18 ms
vglnk.js
38 ms
partners.js
87 ms
angular.min.js
12 ms
pixel.gif
40 ms
pixel.gif
41 ms
favicon
144 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
137 ms
nessie_icon_thin_arrow_big_white.png
32 ms
s
76 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
106 ms
sharing-caring.png
44 ms
sholic.js
58 ms
usermatch
107 ms
beacon.js
34 ms
share-button-shadow.png
27 ms
shareaholic-icons.woff
11 ms
cms-sh2c.html
85 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
48 ms
eexelate.js
40 ms
40 ms
graph.facebook.com
209 ms
count.json
56 ms
usermatch
40 ms
share
101 ms
ping_match.gif
38 ms
ep
66 ms
Vu5idsAoJVkAAExi2sIAAAAS%26630
194 ms
casale
134 ms
210 ms
csle
154 ms
usersync.aspx
144 ms
i.gif
143 ms
2964
66 ms
pixel
90 ms
pixel
129 ms
76 ms
pixel
68 ms
casale
20 ms
crum
184 ms
rum
182 ms
rum
105 ms
net.php
43 ms
crum
132 ms
check
41 ms
m
50 ms
match-result
57 ms
generic
23 ms
rum
119 ms
rs
30 ms
crum
108 ms
ermcm
23 ms
crum
136 ms
ping
16 ms
xrefid.xgi
9 ms
pixel.gif
9 ms
pixel.gif
18 ms
domains
49 ms
xrefid.xgi
5 ms
activeview
14 ms
gildedfork.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gildedfork.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gildedfork.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gildedfork.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gildedfork.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gildedfork.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gilded Fork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: