Tools & Wizards About Us
ginkgodigital.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

ginkgodigital.com

Home - Ginkgo Digital Marketing

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

101 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

117 ms

ginkgodigital.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ginkgo Digital content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ginkgodigital.com

Ginkgo Digital is a creative agency that provides professional services : Marketing, Design, and more.

Visit ginkgodigital.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ginkgodigital.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ginkgodigital.com performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

53/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.9 s

65/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value640 ms

47/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ginkgodigital.com

101 ms

www.ginkgodigital.com

55 ms

bt

84 ms

require.min.js

65 ms

main-r.min.js

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Ginkgodigital.com, 63% (33 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 15% (8 requests) were made to Frog.wix.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (443 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (75%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

661.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ginkgodigital.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 46.9 kB

  • Original 58.7 kB
  • After minification 58.4 kB
  • After compression 11.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 8.0 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 39.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ginkgo Digital needs image optimization as it can save up to 8.0 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 1.9 MB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB
  • After compression 601.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.9 MB or 76% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 52.6 kB
  • After minification 49.6 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ginkgodigital.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (81%)

Requests Now

48

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ginkgo Digital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ginkgodigital.com

ginkgodigital.com

101 ms

www.ginkgodigital.com

www.ginkgodigital.com

55 ms

bt

bt

84 ms

require.min.js

require.min.js

65 ms

main-r.min.js

main-r.min.js

83 ms

viewer.css

viewer.css

68 ms

UpgradeBrowser.js

UpgradeBrowser.js

76 ms

ugc-viewer

ugc-viewer

37 ms

dynamicmodel

dynamicmodel

29 ms

c296e8_aef979451c73b4a7f916187856c4ab4a_15.json.z

c296e8_aef979451c73b4a7f916187856c4ab4a_15.json.z

441 ms

c296e8_7ee1744ba9252f660c0ae062f22b2ae7_13.json.z

c296e8_7ee1744ba9252f660c0ae062f22b2ae7_13.json.z

443 ms

bt

bt

85 ms

skins.min.js

skins.min.js

153 ms

components.min.js

components.min.js

153 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

143 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

39 ms

react-with-addons.min.js

react-with-addons.min.js

79 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

26 ms

TweenMax.min.js

TweenMax.min.js

81 ms

layout.min.js

layout.min.js

136 ms

tpa.min.js

tpa.min.js

138 ms

fonts.min.js

fonts.min.js

136 ms

animations.min.js

animations.min.js

137 ms

swfobject.min.js

swfobject.min.js

137 ms

mousetrap.min.js

mousetrap.min.js

137 ms

tweenEngine.min.js

tweenEngine.min.js

136 ms

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

DrawSVGPlugin.min.js

140 ms

react-dom.min.js

react-dom.min.js

134 ms

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

ScrollToPlugin.min.js

135 ms

widgets.min.js

widgets.min.js

135 ms

experiment.js

experiment.js

135 ms

render.min.js

render.min.js

135 ms

wixappsCore.min.js

wixappsCore.min.js

139 ms

wixappsBuilder.min.js

wixappsBuilder.min.js

134 ms

zepto.min.js

zepto.min.js

133 ms

color.min.js

color.min.js

132 ms

bt

bt

202 ms

react-dom-server.min.js

react-dom-server.min.js

36 ms

dc.js

dc.js

288 ms

bt

bt

271 ms

latin.css

latin.css

263 ms

c296e8_c9142811a4d24e009c54ea44e52b4051.png

c296e8_c9142811a4d24e009c54ea44e52b4051.png

188 ms

mobileIEFix.css

mobileIEFix.css

92 ms

css

css

90 ms

c296e8_25fbaa348bb1463abf6ca7198945f2dc.png

c296e8_25fbaa348bb1463abf6ca7198945f2dc.png

167 ms

fa34b31dc6244a4a854ef6eb8f02ff74.jpg

fa34b31dc6244a4a854ef6eb8f02ff74.jpg

51 ms

bt

bt

50 ms

bt

bt

48 ms

bt

bt

92 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

opensans-regular-webfont.woff

11 ms

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

opensans-bold-webfont.woff

11 ms

Accessibility Review

ginkgodigital.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

ginkgodigital.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ginkgodigital.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ES

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ginkgodigital.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ginkgodigital.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ginkgodigital.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ginkgo Digital. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: