Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

girls-names.ws

WEBSITE.WS - Your Internet Address For Life™

Page Load Speed

4.3 sec in total

First Response

672 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

397 ms

girls-names.ws screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Girls Names content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about girls-names.ws

اسماء بنات جديدة اجمل صور اسم بنت اسامي بنات حلوة اسماء صور اسماء جديدة اجدد الاسماء للبنات احلى اسم بنت اروع اسماء نساء افضل اسماء فتيات اقوى اسماء صبايا

Visit girls-names.ws

Key Findings

We analyzed Girls-names.ws page load time and found that the first response time was 672 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

girls-names.ws performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

girls-names.ws

672 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

40 ms

widget.css

35 ms

style.css

12 ms

skin.css

10 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 44% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Girls-names.ws, 15% (11 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (762 ms) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 499.4 kB (51%)

Content Size

976.6 kB

After Optimization

477.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Girls-names.ws main page is 976.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 383.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 37.8 kB

  • Original 48.2 kB
  • After minification 45.4 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 305.3 kB
  • After minification 294.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Girls Names images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 249.4 kB

  • Original 383.8 kB
  • After minification 380.7 kB
  • After compression 134.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 249.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 201.7 kB

  • Original 239.3 kB
  • After minification 183.1 kB
  • After compression 37.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Girls-names.ws needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (47%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Girls Names. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

girls-names.ws accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

girls-names.ws best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

girls-names.ws SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    AR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Girls-names.ws can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Arabic language. Our system also found out that Girls-names.ws main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Girls Names. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: