8 sec in total
1.9 sec
5.8 sec
260 ms
Click here to check amazing Gleam Futures content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gleamfutures.com
Visit gleamfutures.comWe analyzed Gleamfutures.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
gleamfutures.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value10.4 s
8/100
10%
Value2,850 ms
3/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value12.8 s
13/100
10%
1886 ms
2310 ms
195 ms
28 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Gleamfutures.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gleamfutures.com.
Page size can be reduced by 592.8 kB (44%)
1.4 MB
760.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Gleamfutures.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 641.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 200.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 200.2 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gleam Futures images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 243.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 131.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gleamfutures.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 131.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (55%)
83
37
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gleam Futures. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gleamfutures.com
1886 ms
www.gleamfutures.com
2310 ms
animate.css
195 ms
css
28 ms
reset.css
215 ms
style.css
192 ms
common.css
191 ms
slider_ui.css
191 ms
slider_captions.css
307 ms
slider_captions_style.css
302 ms
entypo-icon-font.css
303 ms
socialico-icon-font.css
305 ms
main.css
324 ms
media.css
416 ms
custom.css
425 ms
style.css
423 ms
styles.css
430 ms
jquery.js
599 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
522 ms
jquery.reveal.js
535 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
330 ms
logo4.png
126 ms
loading.gif
191 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
25 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
41 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
49 ms
boot.js
118 ms
modernizr.custom.js
111 ms
waypoints.js
111 ms
waypoints-sticky.js
129 ms
scripts.js
128 ms
grid.js
133 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.youtube.js
219 ms
modal.png
364 ms
twitter-logo-mini.png
223 ms
froogaloop.js
215 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.vimeo.js
232 ms
jquery.pixelentity.video.js
232 ms
jquery.pixelentity.videoPlayer.js
315 ms
jquery.theme.utils.js
351 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.geom.js
329 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.browser.js
375 ms
jquery.pixelentity.utils.preloader.js
376 ms
jquery.pixelentity.lazyload.js
421 ms
jquery.pixelentity.contactForm.js
440 ms
jquery.pixelentity.widgets.js
460 ms
jquery.pixelentity.widgets.contact.js
459 ms
jquery.pixelentity.volo.js
489 ms
jquery.pixelentity.volo.simpleskin.js
495 ms
jquery.pixelentity.volo.captions.js
531 ms
jquery.pixelentity.widgets.volo.js
548 ms
pixelentity.controller.js
573 ms
init.js
573 ms
comment-reply.min.js
602 ms
jquery.form.min.js
614 ms
scripts.js
643 ms
analytics.js
88 ms
SHOT_09_073-185x137.jpg
194 ms
Screen-Shot-2014-09-23-at-14.22.55-185x137.png
292 ms
IMG_7961gleam-185x137.jpg
123 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-10-13-at-11.30.33-185x137.png
198 ms
GLEAMPICTURE-185x137.jpg
189 ms
josh-185x137.jpg
115 ms
Unknown2-185x137.jpeg
238 ms
Unknown-185x137.jpg
240 ms
Claire_Marshall_Headshot-185x137.jpg
302 ms
IuVhS946Gcv5yluPxqQosIHdXJSoOBba2rVFjeMtCXg-185x137.jpeg
301 ms
chirons-185x137.jpg
315 ms
Diana-185x137.png
459 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-12-16-at-11.08.49-185x137.png
500 ms
photo-1-185x137.png
495 ms
Lily-185x137.png
491 ms
ruth-crilly-185x137.jpg
423 ms
UFxV09Nr-185x137.jpg
438 ms
Unknown-185x137.jpeg
531 ms
Unknown-185x137.png
700 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-03-02-at-15.00.18-185x137.png
646 ms
headshot-11-185x137.jpg
604 ms
Attachment-1-185x137.jpeg
613 ms
20140901_JIMCHAPMAN9657BW-185x137.jpg
613 ms
Unknown-185x137.jpeg
644 ms
profilepic-185x137.jpg
719 ms
11221638_10155693374385545_713653699284949835_n-185x137.jpg
727 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-11-30-at-15.05.16-185x137.png
804 ms
Unknown1-185x137.jpeg
752 ms
Tanya-Website-Photo-1-185x137.jpg
750 ms
Screen-Shot-2015-01-08-at-16.21.38-185x137.png
888 ms
collect
13 ms
gleamfutures.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
gleamfutures.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gleamfutures.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gleamfutures.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gleamfutures.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gleamfutures.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gleam Futures. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: